this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
1 points (55.6% liked)

China, 中国

1007 readers
2 users here now

English

This is a forum dedicated to China, Chinese culture Chinese language, and Chinese people.

Our Matrix chat

Rules:

中文

这是一个专门讨论中国、中国文化、中国语言和中国人的论坛。

我们在 Matrix 的聊天室

规则:


Related communities / 相关的互联网论坛


Community icon by CustomDesign on MYICONFINDER, licensed under CC BY-NC 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More than 80% of people convicted under Hong Kong’s National Security Law (NSL) have been wrongly criminalized and should never have been charged in the first place, according to new research by Amnesty International published on the fifth anniversary of the law being enacted.

The organization’s analysis of 255 individuals targeted under national security legislation in Hong Kong since 30 June 2020 also showed that bail was denied in almost 90% of cases where charges were brought, and that those denied bail were forced to spend an average of 11 months in detention before facing trial.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

“Amnesty International” is an attack dog of the US State Department that has no purpose but to generate headlines bashing the enemies of the Empire, with the very occasional half-hearted jab at the most obviously inexcusable crimes of the US and Europe to maintain their cover as some sort of impartial third-party. On their ‘Take Action’ page, “Join the fight for freedom [sic] in Hong Kong” is displayed before “Lift the blockade on Gaza and stop the genocide”, which should tell you everything you need to know about their priorities.

You didn't engage with any of the points raised by @[email protected], you just ignored them.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You didn't engage with any of the points raised

I did

If you want them to write more reports, consider supporting them, instead of complaining.

You just did not read it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

No, I read that. Your response to Cascade's point of Amnesty International being an attack dog for the West, that doesn't actually care about human rights, was to join them, lol. Your response was just 2 somewhat anti-west articles, when he already showed you how they push some mild critique to add legitimacy while weighting their anti-enemies of Empire articles higher.