this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

563 readers
30 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Its just an instance where tankies can exist in an echo chamber without having to critically think.

If you want you can read some of my comments here and watch these morons make fallacious argument after falacious argument, put words in my mouth, and project some person who makes similarly bad takes which exists inside their head onto me: https://lemmy.today/comment/17304484

Edit: there’s also this thread: https://lemmy.today/post/32415724/17304693

wojak-nooo "Nooo you can't make fun of me for randomly calling china authoritian its supposed to be the natural, obvious, biological, truth of reality you can't expect me to back that up with a source nooo!"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

There's the question of whether Russia is imperialist. In about equal measure, I've seen people here both say that the Ukraine War is an inter-imperialist conflict and that it's actually anti-imperialist on Russia's part. The course of action (revolutionary defeatism) remains the same, but I've seen the occasional Hexbear on Hexbear argument over it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

But the consensus on the site if just that, a consensus. It wasn't just arbitrarily decided, there was a lot of discussion and "struggle sessions" over the idea. Which is the opposite of an echo chamber, the group discussing an idea and then coming to a consensus, even if some individuals in the group disagree with the consensus, they'll accept it, is exactly how a group should work.

The term "echo chamber" is used so much by libs that it loses any sort of potential meaning it could've had. Like "authoritarian" it just means "bad thing me no like."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If it's being argued over, that counts against the "echo chamber" idea though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I missed the "lack of" part of the comment you originally responded to. Sorry.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Stop agreeing! What is this, an echo chamber?!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

No worries comrade