this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1499 readers
19 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source

I see Google's deal with Reddit is going just great...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Well it's referencing something so the problem is the data set not an inherent flaw in the AI

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The inherent flaw is that the dataset needs to be both extremely large and vetted for quality with an extremely high level of accuracy. That can't realistically exist, and any technology that relies on something that can't exist is by definition flawed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

i'm pretty sure that referencing this indicates an inherent flaw in the AI

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

No it represents an inherent flaw in the people developing the AI.

That's a totally different thing. Concept is not flawed the people implementing the concept are.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

"Of course, this flexibility that allows for anything good and popular to be part of a natural, inevitable precursor to the true metaverse, simultaneously provides the flexibility to dismiss any failing as a failure of that pure vision, rather than a failure of the underlying ideas themselves. The metaverse cannot fail, you can only fail to make the metaverse."

-- Dan Olson, The Future is a Dead Mall

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago