Programmer Humor

32724 readers

519 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1610

Of course (lemmy.world)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

146 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Excellent question!

Before replacing the instruction with INT 3, the debugger keeps a note of what instruction was at that point in the code. When the CPU encounters INT 3, it hands control to the debugger.

When the debugging operations are done, the debugger replaces the INT 3 with the original instruction and makes the instruction pointer go back one step, thereby ensuring that the original instruction is executed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Whoo that seems complicated, I mean you akready compile a debug version.

Thanks for the explanation!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The debug version you compile doesn't affect the code; it just stores more information about symbols. The whole shtick about the debugger replacing instructions with INT3 still happens.

You can validate that the code isn't affected yourself by running objdump on two binaries, one compiled with debug symbols and one without. Otherwise if you're lazy (like me 😄):

https://stackoverflow.com/a/8676610

And for completeness: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.1.0/gcc/Debugging-Options.html

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Thanks, excellent information!

How come debug exes are bigger? Is the nifty stuff tucked on at the end?