this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
259 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

71949 readers
4842 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

As long as the wearable contains open source software and preferably open source hardware, then sure, I'd be willing to do so. Because then I could know that I could control where the data went.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Because then I could know ~~that I could control~~ where the data went.

It being open source doesn't mean you can mosify and run your own software on it and still have the agency accept you are compliant.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I said nothing about the agency whatsoever. I don't give a shit what they see as compliant or not. If it's not open source, I won't fucking use it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Pine64's Pinetime is pretty close. I use one. I like it.