this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
675 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59161 readers
2115 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

One of Google Search's oldest and best-known features, cache links, are being retired. Best known by the "Cached" button, those are a snapshot of a web page the last time Google indexed it. However, according to Google, they're no longer required.

"It was meant for helping people access pages when way back, you often couldn’t depend on a page loading,” Google's Danny Sullivan wrote. “These days, things have greatly improved. So, it was decided to retire it."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 112 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Without getting into too much detail, a cached site saved my ass in a court case. Fuck you Google.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Would you be willing to share more? It's fine if you don't want to, I wouldn't either.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No, it was pretty personal, and also a legal matter, so I gotta take the high road.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Respect for your discretion.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Was that not something the Wayback Machine could have solved?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

Depends. Not every site, or its pages, will be crawled by the Internet Archive. Many pages are available only because someone has submitted it to be archived. Whereas Google search will typically cache after indexed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Need the tea!!!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It sucks because it's sometimes (but not very often) useful but it's not like they are under any obligation to support it or are getting any money from doing it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Isn't caching how anti-paywall sites like 12ft.io work?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

At least some of these tools change their "user agent" to be whatever google's crawler is.

When you browse in, say, Firefox, one of the headers that firefox sends to the website is "I am using Firefox" which might affect how the website should display to you or let the admin knkw they need firefox compatibility (or be used to fingerprint you...).

You can just lie on that, though. Some privacy tools will change it to Chrome, since that's the most common.

Or, you say "i am the google web crawler", which they let past the paywall so it can be added to google.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Or, you say "i am the google web crawler", which they let past the paywall so it can be added to google.

If I'm not wrong, Google has a set range of IP addresses for their crawlers, so not all sites will let you through just because your UA claims to be Googlebot

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

I dunno, but I suspect that they aren't using Google's cache if that's the case.

My guess is that the site uses its own scrapper that acts like a search engine and because websites want to be seen to search engines they allow them to see everything. This is just my guess, so it might very well be completely wrong.