this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
442 points (86.2% liked)

Political Memes

5431 readers
3037 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Me too. Thanks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

idk it's an interesting conversation to have, but it's also like saying that owning swords should be illegal or at the very least highly regulated because they can be dangerous.

I don't have a fundamental problem with people owning guns, or dangerous things, i have a fundamental problem with people who have a violent history getting access to guns however.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

A sword is nowhere near as dangerous as a gun, Evan a pistol. A pistol can kill from many feet away, a sword you need to be close. Just because something is dangerous doesn't mean it should be banned, but when you get to a certain level of danger, such as guns, where you could kill 10 people in a second, then they need to be banned. Even pistols are way to dangerous. Also, swords are highly regulated in some states.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

yeah, that's not my point though, do you think swords were designed to sit on a wall and look pretty? They were an instrument of war.

My point is pretty explicit. Also, melee weapons, in particular ranged melee weapons can be incredibly dangerous. You need to be close sure, but you can be behind someone, or they could simply not be paying attention, or you could be concealing a knife as you walk past someone for instance. Technically you can do it with a gun also, but a knife is vastly easier to control.

Likely not as dangerous, but idk how good those stats would be to begin with, a well placed knife wound can fuck someone up proper. Even a center of mass shot with a gun can be trivial to survive.

Also i'm pretty sure 10 a second is hyperbolic, 1 per second i suppose.

Even pistols are way to dangerous. Also, swords are highly regulated in some states.

im pretty sure most states highly regulate guns as well, there are a few that have pretty lax carry laws. But it's questionable how much impact those have.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Then again, an assault rifle can fire roughly ten rounds a second, and you'd have great difficulty stabbing ten people every second with a sword, there is a difference in dangerousness

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

you would have incredible difficulty in landing ten rounds per second, into ten different people, per second. Especially from distance.