660
this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
660 points (95.5% liked)
News
23259 readers
2939 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
cars have doors that can open to facilitate the entering and leaving of human drivers and passangers
hope this helps!
You think people are going to just abandon their cars on the Golden Gate Bridge? Why would they do such a thing?
You think people being stuck in a traffic jam justifies RAMMING, MOWING DOWN, AND MURDERING PROTESTORS?
Because that's the threat that was made at the top of this subthread in response to being "held hostage" 🙄 in their car.
Let me reiterate just how FUCKED and PSYCHOPATHIC that is: they think that just because they're stuck in a traffic jam that happened to be caused by a protest, that's somehow equated to a hostage situation and justifies them using LETHAL FORCE to escape. Because the option of simply getting out of the goddamn murder machine and walking is unfathomable to their entitled, leaded-gas-riddled mind.
Are you fucking sure that's the position you want to be defending right now?!
When did I even imply that it justified that? Why do you think the only two options are 'abandon your car' or 'run people over?' Because I'm pretty sure the people actually on the bridge didn't attempt either.
https://lemmy.world/comment/9422815
Read the comment that started this whole shitshow. That, ultimately, is what you're supporting!
No, ultimately, it isn't.
I think I have a better idea of what I support than you do.
So are you repudiating your previous comments in this thread defending the false characterization of getting stuck in traffic as a "hostage situation" and supporting those who advocated violence against protestors?
Please quote me supporting the comments that advocate such things. Let's see where I did such a thing.
Replying in a comment chain where such things are mentioned does not indicate support.
Are you willing to say "I reject the premise that blocking traffic is a 'hostage situation' and I do not support violence against protestors?"
If you're not willing to say that, well, we know where you stand.
I'm not going to follow your orders, but I already made it very clear that I do not support running over protesters, so I'm not sure why you need me to take your loyalty oath.
The amount of commenters arguing that you can just leave your car in the middle of the road and that you should just "get over it" is pretty insane. How do these people live their lives lol
We are not arguing you should leave your fucking car you PUTZ, we are telling you that it's not a hostage situation. I understand, I really do. It sucks so much to have to wait 10 minutes for once in your busy life, but to pretend that being held up is a hostage situation is fucking absurd.
Those protestors aren't very good at protesting if they can only manage 10 minutes.
Maybe you should try, see how long you can get? Oh wait, sorry, I forgot you lack the empathy and courage required to even attempt a traffic-blocking protest.
They definitely the type to think that is a reasonable thing to do. They also assume every single person blocked is able bodied and can travel the rest of their commute on foot, work through the day, and travel on foot back to where they were forced to abandon their car blocking the bridge without it somehow getting towed. They think this because they're a moron.
Or just somehow sacrifice a car they paid who knows how many thousands of dollars for and never worry about it again.
Okay... how will abandoning their car on the bridge save anyone's life?