378
Microsoft is trying to convince Windows 10 users to upgrade with full-screen prompts
(www.theverge.com)
this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
378 points (98.0% liked)
Technology
35121 readers
9 users here now
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If only they didn't intentionally give up compatibility with 250 million PCs by introducing artificial CPU requirements, then adoption rate would be higher...
But blackrock and vanguard (they control ~15% of Microsoft, Intel, AMD) really needed to increase their profits by selling more CPUs...
Also it didn't help that until October 2023 the taskbar was completely broken and unusable, people like me forbid the installation of the os in the company for that reason alone
Uhh, Vanguard and Blackrock are ETF providers, those stocks are assets under management
They don't "control" anything about those companies.
Yeah, maybe a few delusional shit heads making insane decisions for absurd reasons completely insulated from reality by a thousand layers of abstraction isnt good and we should just count anything run this way as already dead?
This is what finally pushed me fully over the edge to Linux on my main PC. Nothing wrong with it but they just don't like it.
the taskbar still broken and unusable.
icons straight up disappear when you switch virtual desktops using the touchpad, tray icons sometimes don't show up, messing with some things can cause an explorer crash
On my end, the icons disappearing happens sometimes when switching with the keyboard. Also, I happen to use full labels on the taskbar items (like on 95 to vista) and they're all sorts of broken, especially when changing virtual desktops.
Also, despite having quite beefy hardware (Ryzen 9 + 4090), I can't use an image as wallpaper (only a solid colour) otherwise changing virtual desktops has like a inexplicable 1 second lag after pressing the shortcut keys.
This is the kinda shit people would give up on Linux for.
I don't mind upgrading but windows won't allow me... MacOS looks not bad. Or linux
Lin...UX?!
What do you mean by the taskbar being unusable? I used it on my windows 11 laptop way before october 2023.
You still can't make it narrow or move it to the sides of the screen either. It sucks at work at 1080p because the taskbar takes up half the screen it's so massive.
Combined icons make the computer unusable for who has multiple windows open from the same application.
For example if you constantly have to switch between 5 excel files you can't directly click on which you need
It's the reason I can't stand MacOS at all
Sure, that's not ideal, but it's far from unusable. I've used the combined icons since windows 10 wqs released and never had any issues. It works fine for me.
I mean, not defending Win11 here, it has lots of other issues, but I'd just put each excel sheet on a different virtual desktop and switch with the keyboard. Always felt that clicking was a bit inefficient anyway.
Well, you can't directly click, but all you need to do is hover for half a second, then click the window you want (which open up above). It's a non-issue.
Is the order always the same? But still, it's quite human to be disturbed by it. A website that loads longer than 200ms is perceived as slow. 500ms on a desktop action is considered slow, so it is an issue for some. Can't just dismiss it because for you it's fine. Not everybody's you.
Anti Commercial-AI license
It keeps the order in which it was open, it's not 500ms, and we can certainly dismiss someone that says something is unusable when it is in fact usable just not in the way they like.
Lol, OK grand master of all truth. May your word be our thoughts.
🤣
Anti Commercial-AI license
I mean I didn't check how long it actually takes, it's not 500ms.
It opens quick, but I can't find the default value (you can change the behavior via registry), but it's definitely less than half a second. Especially when you're already hovering down there it appears near instant for me.
And let's be honest: The only reason why multiple icons worked back in the day was because the name of the open workbook was next to it. So you had "(Excel) My Workbook 123.xlsx" in your taskbar. Which ended up as a mess when you had several programs open. Now you have one Excel icon, you hover over it and you see all your open workbooks as a preview so you select the one you want. It's definitely cleaner.