267
Cargo ship that hit Baltimore bridge was involved in Antwerp collision in 2016
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
267 points (97.5% liked)
News
23311 readers
3595 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Defective management seems more like it. Poor maintenance, overworked crews, etc.
I got thru the 'friends network' that the ship had lost power, and put out a 'mayday' call. This explains why so few cars were on the bridge at the moment of the collision.
The BBC have a video of the full thing.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-68667813
There's maybe a minute between power going out and the collision. Still cars going over at that point. Google Street View doesn't seem to show any lights or barriers that could have been used, and I don't know anyone that can scramble a road black that fast. That's a half mile long bridge. They had no chance.
The reason there's so few deaths is just because it was the middle of the night.
Wikipedia says 1.6 miles. So it was already heading towards the support when power went out? Ah, I see power went out twice. I had also noted the black smoke in the first video I saw.
the black smoke is likely full throttle upon regaining power to attempt avoiding the structure.
The bit that actually collapsed was half a mile long. The rest seems to still be standing, so anybody on that bit would have been alright.
Hard to tell the path of the ship from that compressed angle tbh, or how far away it was. Dunno what anyone is supposed to do about it with a few minutes notice like that.
It was also 1:30 am, and work crews were pouring concrete fixing the bridge at the time. That probably meant at least some kind of reduced traffic during the night work I would think.
There would have been a police detail on the bridge with the construction crew. Which is incredibly fortunate. Sounds like they were in the best place they could be for such a tragedy.
It’s a shame they couldn’t help more of the workers escape.
The increase of “accidents of chance” infers that maybe they aren’t so “of chance”, basically
Per USA Today
I would bet management/owners have refused to pay for basic maintenance over crew objections and that's going to be a direct cause of this accident
e; better source, "Cargo ship lost power and issued mayday before hitting Baltimore bridge, governor says"
I really, really doubt a ship they expect to cross oceans to make money, was skimping on maintenance. I could be wrong, i mean, look at fucking boeing, but it's cheaper to maintain your shit than deal with the consequences, even when the consequences are simply a break down, not this. and it's MAERSK.they have money.
Pics, stories, or it didn't happen.
You can't just say that and not throw one good anecdote out there. The masses demand story time!