this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Damn, that's interesting!

4677 readers
1 users here now

  1. No clickbait
  2. No Racism and Hate speech
  3. No Imgur Gallery Links
  4. No Infographics
  5. Moderator Discretion
  6. Repost Guidelines
  7. No videos over 15 minutes long
  8. No "Photoshopped" posts
  9. Image w/ text posts must be sourced in comments

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (4 children)

This is so uniquely depressing. They were accurate on my annual wage in 2024 yet they assumed Iโ€™d be working less than 40 hours ๐Ÿ˜ญ

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Is it really accurate? They wrote this is '66 about the year '00, which is 34 years. It's been another 24 years since their prediction date.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

With the 1966 labour share of income you probably would be working way less (or making way more)

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I think you misread that, because $40,000 in 1966 is roughly $385,000 in today's dollars.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

That was the joke. I make $40k today.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Pretty sure that's the joke

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I got that wage, but not accounting for inflation...

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Same. I made 36k last year. I looked it up rq and in 1966 dollars 36k would be equivalent to 350k now.