this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8433 readers
43 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
so, in the US, the way the powers prevent civil servants from giving people money who don't meet the latest bullshit requirements, but obviously need the money is that they make those people responsible for it in perpetuity.
so, when the system is scrutinized or audited in the future (and they always fully fund that side so everything is tripled checked), the government forcibly takes the money out of their account immediately and renders fines and penalties if their current balance won't cover it. which of course incurs more fines from their bank, and basically cripples them from participating at all in the formal economy for years. it's insanely punitive, so case workers are terrified of giving anyone anything extra.
also, if the case worker makes a good faith mistake and awards "too much" it's the same thing: the client of the program gets obliterated.
it's draconian and in sharp contrast to massive contracts for capital formations who just get the money and openly pocket it without hitting deliverables.
Sounds about right for this shit hole country but it's not something I've heard before. Could you link a source?
You mean the civil servants have to pay the disabled person's benefits out of their own money if they wrongly award it?
no, the disabled person does. and if it isn't repaid immediately, they intercept/garnish any other income until it is. and I'd such an interception would create an "extreme hardship", they will take less at a time but never waive what is owed. and that's only if the person has the paperwork/proof of extreme hardship to make the appeal. meanwhile, they also disqualify one from receiving future assistance they do qualify for, until the overpayments are paid back.
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0400-0499%2F0414%2FSections%2F0414.41.html
it's an extremely punitive system for the person requesting assistance.
The beneficiary.