tjhart85

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I, personally, don't see that happening, but I can easily imagine them making it a TOS violation to use adblock and then killing your account if you continue to do so :-/

[–] [email protected] 143 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (14 children)

Same with Google's ads in general. For a long time they were whitelisted by default on just about every adblock list out there because they were so unobtrusive it didn't make sense to bother blocking them, especially when you compared them to the other ads that were common at the time. They were also generally relevant ads, so people actually did click on them and use them since it actually related to the thing they were searching for.

They're obviously more profitable now, but you have to wonder by how much and if they'd be a more trusted company today (and what's that worth monetarily) if they hadn't gone down this race to the bottom.

ETA: Part of what I mean is that now they create things like Stadia and most people didn't even bother trying it because they knew it'd hit the Google Graveyard in a few years. Had Google been a more trusted company, people may have been willing to give it a try and they could possibly have printed money since by all accounts the service was actually pretty good.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Yeah, and I can't speak for everyone here, but I didn't even bother trying it even though I was intrigued. It seemed like the kind of thing that could be completely game-changing and I wasn't willing to get hooked on another Googler's pet project that'd just get the axe in a few years. It's a self fulfilling prophecy at this point, nothing new is likely to get any traction because no one wants to run the risk and then Google cancels it. If they were willing to put in writing that they'll support something for x number of years (that's end user facing, not just whatever contracts they make with devs or whatever), it'd probably go a long way, but they're not willing to support an expensive flop if the product is what actually sucks, so, they're not likely to do that.

Hell, even anything older still runs the risk at any time :-\

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

When I installed fdroid from their website a month or two back it was like 2 or 3 clicks. Then whenever I want to install anything from there it's an extra click or two over what it would be from Play.

I've seen people click through way more complicated processes than this without even knowing they did it. Modern computing has taught people to just keep hitting whatever the approval text is (yes windows, I really do want to copy all of these god damn files. Yes, really, I still do! Yep, again, ALL of them!)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I'm a millennial that doesn't like avocado at all, so, speaking of disgraces!

We managed to get a house, but there are also 3 of us with no kids, I can't imagine managing with two people in todays economy. We got in just before the rates skyrocketed in 2021, the house price is basically what the inflation calculators say the original owners bought it for decades ago, so, there's that at least, that we only paid the equivalent of the original list price for a 5-6 decades old house with decades of shoddy repairs such as every single plug with a ground having the ground pin tied to the neutral!

It's a real rough time out there right now though with ownership out of the realm of possibility for so many :-\

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

ok, Millennial ... look at you over there ::checks notes:: loving the woman you married! What a disgrace!

Seriously though, best of luck through this and hopefully the 1st Amendment is upheld

ETA: Not sure on your age here, was just a joke to play on the boomer 'wife bad' stereotype that in my experience is way too accurate.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Regardless of anything else, it's a medical procedure, your employer shouldn't be privy to private medical details just because they don't agree with them. You should be able to get a doctors note that you're having a procedure, will require time to heal and be done with it, in any reasonable world, but ... here we are.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 months ago

Sure, if you read it, but what about if you just go on feels like they do with their holy book?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean, they're cops, chances are very high that they suck at their jobs.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

Right?! Super easy to be "privacy focused" when you just flat out refuse to acknowledge anything as personally identifiable information!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

SCOTUS declaring this illegal in 3...2...1!

/S (I hope)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Right‽

The movie was unbelievably dumb and personally I loved it! Dunno what that guy wanted/expected out of the movie, but I feel like it delivered on what the title promised me

view more: ‹ prev next ›