Like anything in government its not done logically, its done based on the whims of voters.
teppa
joined 2 weeks ago
The theory that can explain rising drug potency under prohibition was first described in 1964 by Armen Alchian and William R Allen. It states that when the price of two substitute goods is increased by a fixed per-unit amount (such as transportation or taxation) the consumer will opt for the higher priced, higher quality good because the price of the more expensive product has sunk in proportion to the price of the less expensive product.
Suppose, for example, that high-grade coffee beans are $3/pound and low-grade beans $1.50/pound; in this example, high-grade beans cost twice as much as low-grade beans. If a per-pound international shipping cost of $1 is added, the effective prices are now $4 and $2.50: High-grade beans now cost only 1.6 times as much as low-grade beans. This reduced ratio of difference will induce distant coffee-buyers to now choose a higher ratio of high-to-low grade beans than local coffee-buyers.
This is whats happening to drugs, prohibition forces logistics costs upwards and so higher potency becomes more standard.
There wouldnt be a housing crisis if there was no government zoning, zoning which is intended to increase property values and block new entrants. Its like a rhetorical question as to whether they should increase density to the people trying to decrease density, their answer will of course be no.
Theyve announced the "planning" of a high speed rail in order to garner votes, which will somehow cost double what Europe spends. This is vaporware and you wont get a shovel in the ground.
The EV rebate is coming back:
As far as mass immigration from low carbon countries to Canada I'm surprised you wouldnt assume that increases emissions, especially given we are importing them into a housing shortage caused by a lack of density and no existing high speed rail, so they will be required to commute long distances. Canadians per capita emissions are very very high.
climate disaster protection agency
Doing what, like controlled burns of forests?
I think we have something like that already if I'm not mistaken, its likely just lost all its funding since the Federal government began taking a larger chunk of peoples disposable income.
We did mass immigration from low emission countries to boost consumption, BC just chose China to produce their new ferries which derives 60% of its energy from coal and has no industrial carbon tax, our largest city is still overwhelmingly zoned for urban sprawl as we subsidize EV for the rich instead of building high speed rail.
I'd say Canada overall doesnt care about emissions. There are countless examples of that.
Deleted by author
They are going to see a 2 million dollar price tag on a home or 6 months of miserable weather and they are going to leave. This is why we can only import people to perform capital shallowing, and not any educated people.
I feel Conservative generally means small government and limited government control with more of a free market approach, would a conservative support authoritarianism?
He meant it, he's just rolling it back for optics. The average conservative voter in Ontario is likely to agree with his initial comment.
Carney is already removing their ability to block projects if you haven't read the news.
I'm also surprised that the new housing minister wants affordable housing while not having housing prices fall. Its like we were lied to again, which makes no sense, how could this happen?