slurpyslop

joined 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)

skeletons and filth everywhere EXCEPT the gem

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

oh no their ai is broken they're stuck in a loop

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

can't withhold a vote because policy won't change because if it did people would withhold their vote and then the policy would change

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

"it's not wasteful because now they're only wasting less resources"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

it's not a mistake because it's not a real rule

This isn't an example of how modern English is going to the dogs. Less has been used this way for well over a thousand years—nearly as long as there's been a written English language. But for more than 200 years almost every usage writer and English teacher has declared such use to be wrong. The received rule seems to have originated with the critic Robert Baker, who expressed it not as a law but as a matter of personal preference. Somewhere along the way—it's not clear how—his preference was generalized and elevated to an absolute, inviolable rule.

one less thing for you to worry about

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (4 children)

But NFTs aren't wasteful.

i feel this take is a pretty good justification not to care about your opinion on things

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (40 children)

the democrat party will lose if a segment of their voter base abstains from voting

and

the democrat platform can afford to completely ignore a segment of their voter base so doesn't need to adjust their platform

are two mutually exclusive positions

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)
  • nfts are wasteful
  • your justification for ai not being a wasteful use of resources is that you personally use them
  • people still use nfts
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

pick a quote that you know by heart

so step 1 is actually "learn a long, obscure quote by heart" because obviously it can't be a common quote or it completely breaks the method, and the only quotes you're likely to know are common

you're right this is so easy

you’re still confusing the example with what it exemplifies.

In most other quotes, the only capitalization occurs once at the start, so it doesn't add any meaningful entropy.

At this rate it’s rather clear that you’re unable to parse simple sentences,

somebody's a little spicy over the fact that they gave terrible advice :(

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children)

"it's not wasteful because now they're only wasting less resources"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (10 children)

I use NFTs for a variety of productive purposes. You may not, and that's fine, but that's just you. You can't dismiss anything that you personally don't have a use for as "wasteful."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Step 2 is “hard”? Seriously???

I don't know how you're meant to remember that "Works" and "Mighty" are capitalized

In most other quotes, the only capitalization occurs once at the start, so it doesn't add any meaningful entropy.

If you try to harden it further, by using more words

Yours doesn't scale due to step 3.

On the other hand, much like battery staple, it's pretty easy to make up a visual or story in your head to connect the words.

Also, why would you need to scale this past 6 words? At that point it's already more likely that your password is compromised via a keylogger or similar than anything else.

Even in English, a language that typically uses short words, your method requires ~30 characters per password.

I'll accept this as a downside of the method, but honestly a website that limits your password character length to under 30 is probably doing some other weird shit that isn't good.

Also, the only time you should really be using this method is if for some reason you don't want to use a password manager. Not many scenarios like that that also limit characters.

yet the harder to remember

I feel like the exact opposite is true? Pretty easy to remember "defenestrate". Much easier than remembering which m turns into a 3 in your method.

The 11 characters password is not the suggestion, but an example,

I'm aware how examples work. It's 11 characters long and already too hard to remember.

view more: next ›