I 'am' an anarcho-communist and I don't like libtards. Libtards to me are 'progressive capitalists' that have no systemic insight what so ever and think all it takes to bring upon heaven on earth is to try and be nice.
I mean, you should try and be nice obviously but you are not going to soy latte your way outta this my dudes.
The one word more people need to know about: threatmodel
Adding a DENY ALL line to the top of iptables, getting disconnected, realizing that I'm fucking SSHing into this removed...
Slow heavy metal playing in the background
I don't understand this either. There's no fucking algorithm overlord here right? No fucking tiktok, youtube bullshit required.
If you want to say fuck, fucking say fuck.
On another note. Thx for introducing me to the robustness principle ♥️
No problem man. I hope it works out for you! I found it something to get used to after I stopped smoking tobacco 5 years ago but I went haven't looked back ever since.
Enjoy!
I have no experience with the B but I think they should be fine. It's the same tip as the M but just a silicone stem. There will be a durability difference in relation to stainless steel obviously but that's why it's cheaper.
Make sure to watch a few videos because there is a little bit of a learning curve and the activity itself is different from smoking a joint.
With regards to health vaping is currently assumed to be definitely less hazardous.
Your experience may vary per vape and temp settings. I cannot imagine you get proper high from a joint but not from the same amount of weed in a mighty or tinymight2. But tbh in a dynavap should work too if you hit it well at reasonably high temperatures.
Ahhh yes the tampon phase. I remember those days.
Although in 2024 I would recommend anyone to be done with smoking and buy a vaporizer. Even if you don't consume as much, a dynavap is only 40-60EU, allows you to pretty much use any heat source, gives excellent vapor and is built to last.
Vaporents are the future :)
Does such an angle exist from the google perspective? Probably.
Is it 'just' this and nothing else, I'd argue no.
Matters tend to be more complex than simple black and white statements.
I for one think Mozilla is one of the most visible actors with regards to privacy promoting thought and FOSS, with widespread 'mainstream' reach. If it wasn't for Firefox I'd have to use chromium for instance, and that would make the world a sadder day.
I do agree that funding from google is an obvious conflict of interest and probably influences policy in a way not a 100% aligned with humanitarian goals. This is definitely less than ideal and I think everybody involved on this side of the fence would like to see that change. Maybe you could help them with that?
I love it. Reddit time has been decreased by 95% and do not miss it at all.
I'm unsure what you mean by this. Would you be willing to elaborate?