How is Hanania the "ex" Nazi a credible source on this at all? For fucks sake!
maol
joined 2 years ago
That was always gonna happen!
unifying demands
hostile takeover
Pick one, you can't have both.
They need an option for "very uncomfortable".
Everything I have read about this guy creeps me out or pisses me off.
An extremely scary survey:
He's obviously lying to try to pretend he's some media mastermind rather than a cult member/cult leader.
I think the first Guardian article had some value, just because the reporter hung around the Collinses long enough that they indicted themselves through their own actions and words. Whether that outweighs giving two eugenicists a platform to tell people about their beliefs is difficult to judge.
Iirc, whatshisface defended himself by claiming that black parents were more likely to hit their kids, therefore it was racist to criticise him for doing so
Slate says: "For the Love of God, Stop Profiling This Couple!"
The Collinses are ineffective, abusive industry plants from Peter Thiel’s extended circle. They know they’re entirely media creations. They play off that fact to ensure that journalists never follow up on how many initiatives they’ve started and abandoned, neglect to interrogate their contradictory stances on issues like abortion and “race science,” and even seem to accept that they’re openly being taken for a ride by these dorks. Yet in spite of it all, no one listens to their podcast, they don’t really have much of a following, and their specific appeal is concentrated to a few far-right circuits.
The use of the word sincere here bothers me.
AI = austerity. Replacing creaking but functional systems with crap that doesn't work is a little bit cheaper, and the money goes to the right people (billionaires) instead of the wrong people (doctors, nurses, cleaners, admin).
It's just racist as hell. A revival of excited delirium pseudoscience.