knightly

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

For that price they could have included a nicer jar..

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

D'awwh, cutie need some backup lungs for that baby bong rip?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 days ago (7 children)

What groundwork? I see more of the DSA and communist parties at 50501s than Democrats.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (3 children)

You can quote me if you want, I can guarantee you'll somehow manage to misread "Democrats lots because they didn't hold a primary and ran a bad candidate rather than admit that the former candidate was sundowning" as somehow being my fault. XD

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (5 children)

When do you think the Democrats plan to start on the groundwork?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Who, precisely, are you accusing of this and how do you think they are strengthrning the regime?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Omg, I feel this every time I leave the house.

Even when the sports bra is visible under the collar of my shirt, nobody pays attention.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Zohran Mamdani won the NYC primary, so it sure sounds like the voters are paying attention.

Whether or not the party wants to listen is their perogative, so long as they claim to represent us they can rise or fall on the strength of their promises to us and our faith in their willingness to make good on those promises.

"Nothing will fundamentally change" sure isn't working as well as Obama's "hope and change", is it?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Are you today's explanation?

Are you today's right-winger cosplaying as a lib?

Every time the Dems lose, they go to the center to find voters.

The center is to the left of where the party was 10 years ago. If the party actually acted like you suggest they are then they wouldn't have lost to an 80's villain twice.

If you want them to go left, you have to give them wins first.

Why would they go left if the plan to find a middle ground with Republicans was working?

Right now every time they go left, they lose.

Zohran Mamdani.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

Bernie Sanders.

Every time they've gone left they've won, every time they reject the left they lose.

Hell, even that neoliberal Obama who never kept his campaign promises still at least promised us hope and change and won twice, but now the Democrats can only promise that nothing will change. I guess we can credit them with being honest?

Biden gave green energy and build back better. The reward? Lose the house. Harris was going to pretty much continue. What was the answer?

The answer is that Biden never went left. "Green energy" is a neoliberal plan to replace fossil fuel subsidies with rare earth subsidies while changing nothing about their extraction, manufacturing, or distribution processes and "Build Back Better" never passed.

A continuation of nothing is still nothing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I wish I had that much power, then I'd simply demand that the Democrats run good candidates that people would vote for.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Blaming voters for your candidates' failure sure is a good way to get more voters, isn't it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (15 children)

You are why the Democrats feel safe to run shitty candidates.

view more: ‹ prev next ›