jaschop

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Oh mein Gott, du hast Recht! SSP hat ja 3 mögliche Ausgangszustände. Darauf hat mich die Uni nicht vorbereitet!

Oder ich weise dem Unentschieden einfach ein Ergebnis von 0,5 Siegespunkten zu, damit meine Formeln wieder funktionieren. Dies werde ich tun.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Absolventy einer mathematischen Spieltheorie-Vorlesung hier.

Der einzige Weg mir ersichtliche Weg, wie man die Prämisse mathematisch präzise formulieren kann, ist die Gewinnchance der reinen Strategien (Schere, Stein, Papier) gegen die optimale gewichtete Strategie.

Das Ergebnis ist genau was du beschreibst: erst 50% Stein, dann 50% Papier & 0% Stein, dann 33% alle.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Alle Leute die noch nie geraucht haben, und deswegen manchmal uncool waren, und sich jetzt validiert fühlen wenn andere damit kämpfen aufzuhören sagen eyyyyyyy...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Münchy 1: Ziemlich sicher hat der Dampfwalzen-Schorsch gerade volle Kanne über den Zipfel einer Fliegerbombe drüberasphaltiert. Ach, wie sollen wir die Straße eigentlich nennen?

Münchy 2: Halt meine Maß!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Endlich mal wieder ein markenrechtlicher Sieg, nach den bitteren Hafermilchkriegen.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ne, das hat @Korne127 schon auf den Punkt gebracht. Menschys die Causa X unterstützen kritisieren, weil nicht genug gegen Causa Y getan wird ist kein Gewinnerzug.

Intersektionalität du lernen musst, um eine geschlossene Front gegen die Reaktion zu zeigen.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Dafür gibts immer noch Depp Große Datei Lagerung

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Um originalen Pfostierer mal auf eine innovative Art zu dissen:

arbeitete an etwas, das sich nicht einfach speichern lässt

Welch primitive Technologie ist das denn? Alle ernstzunehmende Rechenknecht-Arbeit sollte in Textdateien speicherbar sein, um bei Bedarf im Versionskontrollsystem abgelegt zu werden!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Cooler Käfer! In anderen Neuigkeiten, mein Vertrauen in unsere gesamte Rechenknecht-Infrastruktur hat weiter gelitten.

xkcd 2030

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

whatever minor body of irrelevant five-follower internet loons might bother trying to argue the literal uselessness of a predictive text generator

/c/techtakes mention!?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Leider 94 Tage zu spät pfostiert und nicht mehr lustig.

 

I haven't watched it. I don't know how well she will cover the subject or how deep the rabbit hole she will venture.

All I know is she's delightful and I sure as hell won't read that bilge myself, so I'm looking forward to an entertaining summary.

Edit: I watched it. I had a good time.

 
 

archive of the mentioned NYT article

 

So I recently got an excuse rant about my opinions on federated tech. I think it's pretty much the best we can hope for in terms of liberating tech, with very few niches where fully distributed tech is preferable.

Needing a server places users under the power of the server administrator. Why do we bother? "No gods, no masters, no admins!' I hear you shout. Well, there's a couple reasons...

Maybe using software is just an intrinsically centralized activity. One or a few people design and code it, and an unlimited number of people can digitally replicate and use it. Sure, it may be free software that everyone can inspect and modify... but how many people will really bother? (Nevermind that most people don't even have the skills necessary.)

Okay, so we always kind of rely on a central-ish dev team when we use tech. Why rely on admins on top of that? I believe the vast vast majority of people doesn't have the skills and time to operate a truly independent node of a fully distributed tech. Let's take Jami as an example:

"With the default name server (ns.jami.net), the usernames are registered on an Ethereum blockchain."

So a feature of Jami is (for most users) implemented as a centralized service. Yikes. You could build and run your own name server (with less embarrassing tech choices hopefully), but who will really bother?

But say you bothered, wouldn't it be nice if your friends could use that name server too, and gain a little independence? That sounds a lot like decentralized/federated tech.

Keeping a decent service online is a pain in the butt. Installing SW updates, managing backups, paying for hardware and name services... nevermind just the general bothering to understand all that mess. And moderation, don't forget moderation. I'm saying it's not for everyone (and we should appreciate the fuck out of [local admin]).

I believe that servers and admins are our best bet for actual non-centralized tech. A tech-literate person tending a service for a small- to medium-size community is much more feasible than every person running their independent node (which will probably still depend on something centralized).

And maybe that's just the way we bring good ol' division of labour to the Internet. You have your shoemaker, your baker, your social media admin. A respectable and useful position in society. And they lived happily ever after.

view more: next ›