I think liberal psychology is built on classism, and this guy is an example.
This is the author https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Tierney_(journalist)
John Marion Tierney (born March 25, 1953) is an American journalist and a contributing editor to City Journal, the Manhattan Institute's quarterly publication. Previously he had been a reporter and columnist at the New York Times for three decades since 1990.[1] A self-described contrarian, Tierney is a critic of aspects of environmentalism, the "science establishment," and big government,[2] but he does support the goal of limiting overall emissions of carbon dioxide.[3]
So he's a "contrarian." He elaborates:
Tierney described his TierneyLab blog as being "guided by two founding principles":[8]
- Just because an idea appeals to a lot of people doesn't mean it's wrong.
- But that's a good working theory.
He doesn't say "People have been misled by powerful interests, and we must fight disinformation." He starts with the idea that the masses are wrong. I think that's an axiomatic posture for him. And it aligns with his self-interest: if the masses are wrong, they need liberal elites, like him, to rule them. This is also how imperialists think. "The colonized cannot rule themselves, so we have to rule over them."
I think this is the liberal mindset in a nutshell. They're PMC hall monitor nerds who look down on the human race because it benefits them.
wow look at that evil-looking picture of him, what the fuck is that lighting