hsdkfr734r

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

In der Tat! Das hätte man kurz nach dem Urknall kaum für möglich gehalten. Steckste nicht drin.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not sure if trance or flop. I'm not a rabbit lady. :)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ein Robboter also?

E: ca. 8000€ oder Leasing für einen kleinen dreistelligen Betrag im Monat.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Joachimsthaller

Please don't. One L is enough. ...It is complicated: Joachimsthaler (Joachimstaler since the 1900s). Thank you. ;)

TIL that the original meaning of the word Taler is "from the valley" (Tal).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What confuses me is, although cable tram is perfectly fine, that in my mind a tram is like an omnibus with steel wheels on rails, not a cabin hanging from a cable (without any wheels or even an engine). Even a funicular is closer to a tram.

What do you call it?

Seilbahn. To be fair tram (the thing with wheels on rails) is called Straßenbahn here. So a literal translation of Seilbahn could be cable tram... Um cable car?

Sometimes a tram is made from one or more Straßenbahnwagen (tram car or streetcar). Funny that it is called streetcar but drives on rails and cars which drive on streets aren't.:)

And then the word Seilbahn is used for both, a funicular or a cable car. Although there is the word Standseilbahn for the second.

Meh. Languages are strange.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

The pig belongs to all mankind!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Yes. The blind in the right eye symptom seems to be real. Sadly.

It doesn't change anything about the compact verdict from my point of view. But this injustice feels unfair and people do not feel represented and protected by the state (with the known consequences). The state has the Gewaltmonopol (monopoly on the use of force). For me this implies, that the state has the duty to nvoke its rights equally, regardless of the side.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

The Bundesverwaltungsgericht says no. And constitutional scholars state that one has to endure uncomfortable and ugly opinions (Freiheit Tag und Nacht aushalten, goes the saying, I heard.)

It is stated that hate speech and anti-constitutional tendencies are protected under free speech as long as they are not personal insults or Incitement to ethnic or racial hatred. The Bundesverwaltungsgericht came to the verdict, that compact didn't do that, I guess? My last data point stems from a comment by Tilmann Steffen in die Zeit about the begin and the goals of the trial.

To be clear, I'm worried about the current up-rise of right wing parties and groups in Europe (and about the success of the politians who make these extremist statements their own, to gain influence). But I wouldn't want to ignore constitutional rights to protect the constitution.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wait... So someone with group AB could receive hh blood?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Something is off with the proportions.
She has a body like E.T.

view more: ‹ prev next ›