glizzyguzzler

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

FUCJ that’s a good letter

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mr crabs would use unethical llms, very accurate

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

naughty cord naughty cord naughty cord (because those plugs are into rope play)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Thanks for revealing I will investigate!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

How did you embed alt text with the image like that uwu

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is 2D can yuo generalize to 2nd variable ?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

schlep schlep schlep schlep schlep schlep schlep schlep schlep schlep

352
tithe rule (files.catbox.moe)
 
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

g-g-g-guzzled😭😭😭😭😭😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I can never look at it, because honry is all I got

157
praxis rule (files.catbox.moe)
 
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

This statement is at least twofold:

1 - it says “I do not have to debate to ensure I have basic human rights”, a statement that is clearly true in every instance.

2 - it is a reaction to bad-faith “debating” used as an attack tactic by oppressors; read up on sealioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning

Combine those two facts, and you have people weaponizing “I’m just debating” to keep someone in an unending treadmill of debate where they constantly have to try to prove they deserve basic human rights. It’s actually hell.

Good faith debate and discourse on all key topics the media/gov pushes on us right now has been long settled, none of it is new, so someone actually willing to learn can just search “do trans people deserve basic human rights” or “can minorities be discriminated against by systemic factors” and there’s already robust answers that should not shock you!

No need to make a trans person make a case over and over again that they deserve to live or a Palestinian make a case that the system within which they live is an open-air jail. And that is what this person is saying.

360
rule (files.catbox.moe)
 
 
 

Context is:

  • I was luckily banned from the fallen onehundredninetysix for vehemently rejecting the orchestrated hoodwinking

  • luckily banned because i'd have posted boston's sloppiest there like three times before it properly made it to the people's onehundredninetysix

  • I use the default web UI which is aggressively broken on my old phone like the pleb I am

88
🤤🤤rule (files.catbox.moe)
 
 
149
rule (files.catbox.moe)
 
 

Is the backstory a culinarified and gussied up version of the 1969 movie Easy Rider, which has had Jack Nicholson in the cast?

Or is the backstory what a ghost less version of Ghost Rider starring Nick Cage would look like?

The Maltese-ified run-on sentence Has?

So many questions, like why is Nick The Easy Rider Pancake Mix in my good Prussian German market?

150
hiberuletion (files.catbox.moe)
 
409
rulep (files.catbox.moe)
 

337
rule (files.catbox.moe)
 
view more: next ›