fishynoob

That makes it harder for people who might have benefitted from your solutions, but doesn't do anything to prevent Reddit or OpenAI from accessing them. I don't see a point

Thanks man, that would be much appreciated

Thanks, looking forward to it

Thanks. I don't see the content of the blogs in the feed, just the title - but maybe that's a problem with my reader (I use Capy on Android). I'll try a couple of other readers to see if it works

You got an RSS feed for me?

Any company that makes affordable washing machines without connecting to the cloud?

Your blog is awesome. I have always wanted someone to break down RF homelabbing for me and I think as your blog progresses I will find such content.

I'm also looking for blogs/material on OS hardening (Linux/*nix), do you plan to write on that (and any recommendations)?

Using a SIM has never been private. Cell phone coverage has always been an instrument of surveillance.

Coming back to this thread, I do think some of your comments were inflammatory. If you were to receive a ban, it should have been for trying to bring fights in the comments (but even that is ambiguous at best). I agree that the ban for a comment was too much. An admin shouldn't be conflating one such action with overall behaviour. As for "repeated bad-faith behaviour", it is not so far out to ban you I think. People should be responsible for their own actions.

I went through the list. Google and FairPhone should definitely be moved to "Safe for now" whilst OnePlus should be moved to "Requires an online account/sacrifice" as they limited their unbrick utility which means no more custom ROMs for new OnePlus phones.

I honestly don't understand why Chinese companies do this. They would fare much better against their American counterparts (including Samsung) if they allowed for more open hardware. Goes to show that MBAs at the top of these companies have utter dung between their ears

Thank you for the comment. Definitely looks like there's some interest in hardening Void, with that said most of the kernel protections that I see from your checksec output exist on my Debian system too. I will try it out in a VM then.

Mod is biased. There's no 2 ways around it