fern

joined 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I am not a lawyer and do not know legal law, but I do know that a verbal contracts are legally binding and do not impede upon free speech. This would be a case similar to that. They want to say they will do everything to get something done, I want to see them immediately removed from office for doing shit that counters it.

My point does not in any way interact with FPTP and is not an instead of. All I'm saying is we should legally define what promises you can make on the campaign and hold people accountable for lying to constitutents.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

Rivals of Aether 2 announced there will be no paid DLC because it will be all free. Legislation is needed but there are still, few, good devs out there thankfully.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

Rich and oppression

[–] [email protected] 13 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

No, laws should be in place that make this illegal. I want every speech a candidate gives to be under oath and punishable by being banned from holding office.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago

"It's crazy, all we had to do was inverse the YT algorithm," said anonymous Google employee.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Because you're on Lemmy and no one here seems to be, you included.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

That's if you buy one new, which is only gentrified relabelling of RVs. I just converted a bus myself for 25k, which is what most people who actually live in them full time do. Anyone buying one is likely using it as a "second home" aka RV.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (6 children)

"On purpose" here means "Buying a house isn't an option anymore"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

“I have more respect for loyal DOGS than I do for PEOPLE who don’t take care of their children," in the vacuum they're describing, could be interpreted as having a lot of respect for dogs and little respect for abusive parents, which are not asshole takes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Also not in the religion, they're specifically instructed that they're not to make judgements or enact any punishments on the behalf of god, which this is.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Wouldn't 99% of people who are opposed to murder will never be a murderer the more reflective statement here?

Also pro-choice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Buddy this is critical theory.

143
ABCBB rule (lemmy.autism.place)
 
view more: next ›