deathtoreddit

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

Do you think they'll just give up their power?

No, they'll use economic weapons (eg. scorched earth policy, sanctions, IMF structural adjustments), if not military force (eg. air bombs, drones, missiles), and propaganda campaigns, with their media structure, as we've seen in history before

It's not only just, but necessary, in many times

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Vive Sankara, mort aux imperialistes!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Ok, demcent in process

If the authorities will agree that a leader is martyred, a leader is martyred

Until then, all is up in the air

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

I thought it was derived off the U.S.S.R?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

self-sufficiency (Is this Chinese 'Juche'?)

Zhuti gang, represent!

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

Too bad it's for anti trans reasons 😔

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Ok thanks for the response, glad we're on same terms

spoilerI can't take back my unwarranted rudeness, I just felt like you were one of those typical Lemmy libs that come here to do a one liner to 'own' us... So I said that impulsively

But it seems I was wrong

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

First of all, as one noted, Bosnia and Albania were part of Eastern socialist Block, Bahrain got its development through being a gulf oil-based state

Second, in making the more accurate comparison, how the fuck does India screw up more compare to China? You didn't answer my shit for that. India was left more untouched and preserved, compared to China's initial ruined state pre-Mao

Also, When did I say it was unparalleled?

Do you put words in people's mouths, like you put your dick in your mother's?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

Wish it expanded more

 

I'm confused

So far, I've heard that accumulation, technological advancement, and thus concentration of capital from the previous capitalist economy would leave its print on the later modern socialist economies

But other than that, I've realized I've never looked much into what distinguishes AES's economic management, mainly of state-owned enterprises, from capitalist economy's management, in concrete policy

I can understand co-operatives, but such orgs don't necessarily make up socialism, as you guys would say

to LibsIf you gimme a deeply unserious answer, I will fuck your father


 

The same with Mao, in terms of balancing good and bad policies, of their OWN time.

16
Amerikkka Rule (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

How does even mess up "Republique de Coree" for "Republique Populaire Democratique de Coree"

Anyways, enjoy the recognition, boys!

 

Unless something more material like a whole continent turning anti-imperialist, if not socialist, and deciding collectively to nationalize the fruit and veg produce, and thus disrupts U.S's produce imports -

I don't think any internal problems in America would reach to a boiling point, as to end on a conclusive note

So what if it's a big deal to you, huh, America is the most armed-country, and has a lot of guns, yet no civil war(s) has occurred recently... it's just reactionary settler business as usual

Im America, nichts neues

1
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Ye see, I've been reading a book called "Cambodia 1975-1982" by Michael Vickery (you can find its pdf), and needless to say, its goal is to:

prove{s} that the truth {of 'Democratic Kampuchea'} was much more complex than the situation as portrayed by anti-Communist Western media, by pro-revolutionary sympathizers, or by the regime itself, and would dishearten all three of those groups.

Specifically, D.K Cambodia was split between 2 main power-holding sections, East Zone and Northwest (Viet-allied and gradualist) and Southwest (Anti-Viet, chauvinist), and the Southwest one led by Pol Pot won and purged the rest...

1975-1977 wasn't that bad (more or less attempted economic recovery), but 1977-1979 was Pol Pot's purge time we all know and hate...

Besides that, it talks of People's Republic of Kampuchea from 1979-1982...

I reached this section over here:

Children's work in the old days though was accompanied by much fun and play, as the elephant dung story clearly indicates; and the suppression of fun and play is one of the things which distinguished DK invidiously from pre-revolutionary Cambodia.

Among the comments accompanying the children's drawings was the account of a boy who had worked minding water buffalo, a typical children's chore in Cambodia. He told of being punished twice in one day, once for allowing the animal to run away, also typical, but once for laughing and joking while at work, which for Cambodia was entirely aberrant.

Thoughts on this book, or just on D.K Cambodia?

 

Here is a Basic Marxism-Leninism study plan I copied off, if ye want to understand it

This is the Marxism-Leninism "basic study plan" of the Anti-Imperialism Movement (Movimiento Anti-Imperialista or MAI). I think this is a very decent set of texts to read, so I've translated the original list and added links to all English and free-to-read versions available online. Since people very often ask for this kind of thing I hope some of you will find it useful.

(Don’t procrastinate) Introduction Lenin. The three sources and three component parts of Marxism

Lenin. Karl Marx

Marx, Engels. Manifesto of the Communist Party

Historical Materialism

Marx, Engels. The German Ideology, chapter 1

Scientific Socialism Engels. Socialism: Utopian and Scientific

Lenin. What is to be done? https://socialistrevolution.org/what-is-to-be-done-a-reading-guide/

Lenin. State and Revolution (Ouais?)

Lenin. Texts against revisionism and opportunism:

The historical destiny of the doctrine of Karl Marx

Opportunism and the collapse of the Second International

The collapse of the Second International

Imperialism and the split in Socialism

Certain features of the historical development of Marxism

Marxism and Revisionism

Marxism and Reformism

Lenin. Left-wing Communism: and infantile disorder

Engels. Anti-Dühring, part III: Socialism

Stalin. The foundations of Leninism

Philosophy Mao. On contradiction

Engels. Anti-Dühring, part I: Philosophy

Engels. Ludwig Feuerbach and the end of classical German philosophy

Marx. Theses on Feuerbach

Political Economy

Marx. Wages, price and profit (Ouais) https://socialist.net/value-price-and-profit-a-reading-guide/

Engels. Anti-Dühring, part II: Political Economy

Marx. Capital Volume I

Lenin. Imperialism, the highest stage of Capitalism

1
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

As an easter egg: if you recognize which user I am in hexbear, then ye know...

 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/2858492

I think I understand the simple model of base and superstructure (but that was Gramsci's model)

The simple use of quantitative to qualitative change, and vice versa

The simple fact that contradictions can exist in a society, manifesting in the form of problems, which are symptoms of its economic systems...

I don't think its about thesis + anti-thesis -> synthesis.

I think its about one economic class, like capitalist to feudal lord, dominating over one class, and absorbing its birthmark attributes, before surpassing its birthmarks overall...

Or as if a capitalist upon its created proletariat, not only ruling over them, but co-opting or destroying any of its measures

To me, its about who the ruling most HEGEMONIC class is, and how it operates...

Other than that, I don't know how else to apply it, let alone know if its somewhat broadly accurate....

Correct me if I'm wrong, if not elaborate on what ye mean?

13
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/4937005

If you know, you know

spoilerMost recent South American coup (attempt) against progressive anti-imperialist ruling government


1
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

If you know, you know

spoilerMost recent South American coup (attempt) against progressive anti-imperialist ruling government


 

Apparently, even if I put in English settings for my post, my post is not allowed...

Here's what I wanted to post:

https://web.archive.org/web/20231124232348/https://rebolusyongpangkultura.blogspot.com/2016/03/mga-kanta-ng-rebolusyong-pilipino.html#rebo36

view more: next ›