d00phy

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago

Good start. Emphasis on "START."

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I laughed and immediately felt bad about laughing.

But you're right about rice. A better solution is to use a silica packet. A good argument for keeping some handy instead of throwing them out.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Yeah, that's what I think of whenever I read about the Bradley. Great movie, and even better book. That said, they were able to finally deliver a pretty solid vehicle in the aftermath of the initial development debacle. Still not at all what was originally intended, but less of a moving coffin that was depicted in the book/movie.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This is what frustrates me so much about people in the US arguing against supporting Ukraine. At the end of the day, while China might be willing to help Russia, the US is by far it's largest customer. Add to that China's own economy is contracting, and supporting Ukraine against Putin, along with the severe sanctions that have been in place, is the smartest most cost effective way of hopefully removing him from power. I have a co-worker who got out of Russia a little over a year ago, and he said it was pretty bad before he and his family left. Unfortunately, it's a slow process because the goal is to get the Russian people to oust him. We all know that's not going to happen at the ballot box, so all that's left is the people overthrowing their leaders. Things have to get pretty dire before a population like Russia's gets to that tipping point.

This is a marathon. The main thing is keeping Ukraine strong and able to defend itself. I'm really liking the offensives into Russian territory they've been carrying out. I just want them to remember a defensive position is easier to maintain/win than an offensive one. In other words, don't try to go to far into Russia. Way way too many great generals have made that mistake!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I've driven this exit so many times. That's crazy!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Those articles highlight sanctions against settlers and a "settler group." I didn't see sanctions against Israel.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So as an alternative question so someone who sounds reasonable (it is the Internet after all!), what are your thoughts on a 2-state solution, or Israel’s expansion into the West Bank?

Ignoring of course the fact that a 2-state solution will never ever happen.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

“Hey, look at those leopards over there…”

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)

What about-ism doesn’t make it right for either side. The point is most western countries refuse to publicly call out this kind of racism when it comes from Israel for fear of being painted as antisemitic. Conversely, it’s easy for those same countries to ignore genocide in Gaza and the West Bank, and highlight atrocities committed by Hamas as terrorism.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

King Mierdas is so awesome!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

NEW NFTZ BOUT TA DROP BAYBEEEZZZ!

view more: ‹ prev next ›