cyberblob

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Please finish school, the go study biology, then we can talk on the same level. You are just bullshitting.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Men don’t deserve empathy.

What a frustrated poor little creature you seem to be.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I have no interest to Fire back with the same dishonest, reality-bending shit show, nor do I want to take it on a personal level like you.

Still…

While you are being intelectually and logically dishonest, as repeatedly demonstrated by your almost religious and/or uninformed understanding of nature:

literally giving all life and all cells […] to the fetus

It is obvious that there is a deeper frustration on your side, probably rooted in endless unfruitful discussions. Now its time to realize that the reason for this frustration at a base Level is your incomplete and wrong understanding of biology and chemistry.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Again, I think you are clueless. I agree there is much more nuance to the whole process with hormone gradients and things, but the embryo is its own thing, basically wrapped in a construction site and supplied with building blocks, no matter how hard you wish for the opposite.

And yes, that is pretty much comparable to digestion in a humans that are out of the uterus in the sense that they get stuff to break down, derive building blocks and build up again. The mother takes over the digestion part for embryos, but there is not more magic to this than that.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Look, whatever dude. Believe in a flat earth or whatever you like.

Still, The fetus‘ cells are not cells of the mother. The few molecules of the egg cell quickly dilute in a sea of newly synthesized molecules by the metabolism of the zygote and its repeating cell Division cycle.

You can keep repeating „because the building blocks are provided by the mother“. But that does not make the cells any more their mothers cells than, again, you being a cow when consuming milk. Your logic does Not make sense.

Its similar (not like) recycling. If I melt down metal from old computers to create a new computer. Then we have actually new components, a new computer. Its Not made up of the old Computer in a conventional sense. Sure on the atomic level its mostly the same atoms, but Talking about inheritance on that level brings the discussion to a completely ridiculous level.

Not sure how you justify any other view on this. Certainly not on the grounds of natural sciences or logic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (9 children)

Omg…

Okay, so you do realize that there is no such thing as an „intrinsic mother essence“, right? These are just molecules.

It does NOT matter where the material came from, as long as the molecules are provided. That said, the cells will create most of the molecules variations themself from base molecules, e.g. in case of fatty acid derivatives. Molecules related to energy transfer like NAD or ATP e.g. are generally not provided by the mother but directly synthesized in the cells from predecessor molecules. Similar to all the proteins.

Additionally, there are molecules that are only provided by the mothers body but not synthesized like essential amino acids. They actually have an external origin.

Neither are your cells cow cells because you drink milk or tomato cells because you eat tomatos.

Not sure how the provision of building blocks makes these cells the mothers cells. They Are NOT cells of the mothers body.

You are absolutely clueless, I fear.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago (18 children)

Puh what a rant.

I actually just want to correct you on one thing and I am also Not sure what you really meant.

But we dont get 100% of our cells from our mothers. We get the mitochondria from our mothers. The cells that enclose those mitochondria are perfectly 50/50 after fertilisation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is it irrelevant though?

Lets take it to an extreme: Imagine in Gaza there would be a Nazi regime. Nazis who hate trans people and want them dead. Nazis living there with their families, innocent children etc.

I Understand that it would be worthwhile stopping war actions on all those innocent souls, but would I actively advocate for the Nazi party ruling this imaginary Gaza strip? Certainly not.

Hence, get your act together. Support an end of the war on Gaza, support innocent people. Dont support Hamas!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Wow, keep your emotions at bay, will you?

Not even sure what to respond, except for what I wrote previously: A lot of discourse is broken by calling people whatever and not listening.

You are somewhat setting an example of what I am talking about, since I am not even disagreeing with the opinion that I am infering from your writing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Voting is boring. Just comment yourself. Thats much better. We want content and discussions, Not just numbers;)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I totally agree with your message.

These days everyone who is not ultra-left easily gets labelled as Nazi, similarly everyone who brings up any rather left argument will be called a woke snowflake.

Thus, any dialog is immediately shut down. Listen, understand, exchange arguments.

That is what unites everyone who believes in liberal values.

 

Hey fellow humans,

I just recently discovered Lemmy. I had an understanding of the general existence of the "Fediverse" for some time, but never gave it much thought. Over the past months or so I read a lot on Reddit and by shear accident discovered Lemmy during that time, as a more federated, free alternative to big-corp Reddit.

Do not get me wrong. I am not per se opposed to big corporations. I am a bit more critical with those corporations that are mainly involved with information and data processing, so basically big-tech.

Now here I am, freshly registered to a german instance and I wanted to share my first impressions of Lemmy or the "Lemmy network".

First off, Lemmy seems great. It has a nice and clean UI and its easy to understand.

But, tbh I already had a bad feeling when it came to choosing an instance to register to. Will I be basically at the mercy of whoever runs that server (with what I am allowed to say at least locally)? What happens when that person or group decides to shut down the server over night? Will my account still be valid elsewhere? How does this work?

One could argue, well what happens when Reddit turns off their website; And of course on Reddit I am also at the mercy of moderators; From a single user perspective there always seems to be the single point of failure in both alternatives. But from my experience, "money makes the world go round", meaning: If there is a legitimate business case it is more likely that such a website or instance will stay online, whereas a lonesome enthusiast will likely loose interest after a while. And then its all gone (at least for that instance)? Is Lemmy than a sub-optimal Reddit alternative?

After registration I noticed something additionally "disturbing". There seems to be a big divide in the Lemmy community, as the instances are free to block certain instances. And I read here, about how big this problem apparently is. Hence, it is not about a big blocklist for unwanted instances, it is also about general focus of conversations across instances.

In fact, this puts me again at the mercy of any instance administrator what I am allowed to see or interact with. Is that not a contradiction of a rather free and open network? It appears anti-liberal in some sense. And a liberal digital society is what we would all strive for, I guess?

Ultimately, this would mean I would have to run my own instance to avoid the risk attached to this situation. But the extreme case of that would be that we are all running our own instances. That does not make sense at all. Then everyone runs and instance and we are all more or less blocking each other.

I guess there is no clean way of doing this? And in the end platforms like Lemmy are always formed by the people who drive them. Hence, personal opinions will always play a role.

But I think a liberal real life society goes to show how things should be: There are rules, but freedom of speech is very much emphasized. For me ideal communication involves that everyone can speak their mind. But then, there are certainly somewhere limits.

I am all against safe spaces, but I am pretty much for respectfulness, indulgence, fairness and constructive dispute. I do not fear any argument that is told in the pursuit of having an honest conversation, an exchange of arguments and ideas.

I would even say, when we are hindering ourselves of having this kind of honest dispute, we are loosing our developed societies.

On the other hand (like in the real world) simply insulting people should not be tolerated.

So, I wonder, is this place actually for me, apparently as a rather liberal person?

Is Lemmy liberal enough from your perspective?

Do you have insights or answers with regards to my questions or blind spots?

Thank you in advance and see you around!

view more: next ›