Science of identity?
https://open.spotify.com/episode/7ashCzbsVdFI8ves0cF4HW
I hadn't heard of it til the odd confluence of seeing Prysner's name on QAA. His own podcast eyes left covers her recent bio.
cakeistheanswer
joined 1 year ago
There's some evidence she's a cult member, and was posturing as some kind of Manchurian candidate.
No, really.
Mike Prysner has made a few decent podcasts (QAA, eyes left) following her political career and service. I don't think you can definitionally tie her to membership, but she's got some questionable associations.
Cisco has been clueless for awhile. The people who want speed don't trust them to do basic network stacks, they want to do something more complicated?
The HFT industry noticed Cisco was messing with routing stacks, and you can essentially look to the entire market cap of Arista as a direct result. Specifically people wanting to avoid the headaches of the nexus line (EOS is nice!).
They are the victims of their own success to the point they long ago cannibalized actual product innovation. A lot of the industry still wants their certs, but nobody I know who values speed (local stripped back switches) or stability/availability (AWS and minimal office equipment) would chose them for much. A lot of the purchases are from big players with long contracts, the "Nobody got fired for IBM" of network equipment.
This just screams moving deck chairs on the Titanic.
For the most part what kind of company you are is what kind of product you're selling or making money off of.
So you could contend that Tesla is a battery company or a car company feasibly. Nobody ahead of the AI bubble would have mentioned Tesla and artificial intelligence in the same category.
Besides, if it's what he makes money selling Tesla is a tax credit company.
I think it's grossly undersold personally. What valve has managed is getting the single target platform open source could never agree on.
It's a small miracle, and it bleeds over into stuff like device driver support in a way I don't think most people who didn't deal with Linux in the 2.x era immediately appreciate.
If Linux on the desktop has a surge, they did a lot of the legwork.
If you dive into the theory at all about how ranked choice systems are gamed I think everyone is doomed for a headache.
Don't feel bad, it's infinitely better than what we have broadly, but it demands a lot more of the average voter if you're not voting a party ticket. If you're struggling you're doing it right.
From a macro economic perspective, (and im not advocating for a conspiracy, just aggregate business interest) they're dropping energy usage so they can pay less on their electricity bills.
So actually a double fu. get less so they can pay less rent, to provide lesser service.
Because rent seeking is the only tech bubble left.
I haven't even begun to dig in to everything it can do, but chezmoi is in the arch repo.
https://github.com/twpayne/chezmoi
Fits the bill.
I didn't mean to imply they'd roll in buggy packages, by virtue of release; just that Fedora's function is typically regression testing for the money making product.
The testing is for the much more marketable enterprise window.
Generally Fedora's purpose is to make sure nothing gets into redhat (RHEL) Linux. So if there are breaking changes to things, you'll be getting them.
Historically if people had wanted to learn I'd push them towards Ubuntu because its Debian based, meaning familiar enough to most of what runs the modern internet that I could eventually (I'm not a Linux admin) fix.
These days if you just want to use it I'd pick Linux mint, just since they seem to be orienting towards that way. Arch or SUSE based something if you want to learn more about how the packages you install work together. But the choice in distro honestly feels more like an installer and package manager choice than anything. a distro is just a choice of which thousand things to hide in a trenchcoat.
I just ideologically don't like IBM and would rather hand in my bug reports to the volunteer ecosystem.
This is my one of my favorites for exactly this reason. Agreed, other than the triumph of what little humanity Ted has at the end there's not much in the story.
But despite being a famous asshole it always seemed Ellison loved this story, right down to actually re writing a happy end to the "I have no mouth..." adventure game in the early 90s.
Speculation on my part, but I always thought for a famous pessimist he thought his warning might make a difference, which is its own kind of hopeful.
So, most of the knowledge of what levers are exploited is going to come out of industry. I don't expect him to know a common persons problems, but he might know how to help.
When Obama was nominated I pretty instantly had my pulse raised over Tom Wheeler (FCC) and Tim Geitner (treasury), only to find myself surprised by Tom. His pick Jessica Rosenworcel is probably the best thing in my lifetime, and common carrier laws have only really held because he's been ready to stick it to Comcast.
Geitner should be behind bars.
It really depends, and a lot of what's on record from their time in industry is the company line. it's kind of counter intuitive, but things like 'pork' in bills in congress get cooperation because they can seek new organizations of power.
Divide and conquer works on the powerful too.