aramis87

joined 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago

Umm, both of those articles are from 2020. He's making slow progress with The Haunted Chocolatier while he continues to tinker with Stardew; I haven't heard much about the other game.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

For the Raj period, there's also The Jewel in the Crown. For the Company Rule period, there's Beecham House.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Umm, could you please share the recipe your looking at for lentil bolognese? Please, and thank you!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

I always worry about pets during crises; it's good that some people have the timr to help :)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh, cool. Do X next!

[–] [email protected] 56 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I'm entirely willing to believe that some underpaid TSA grunt looked at the situation and said to themselves, "Oh, it's that guy again. Well, he's no longer making a fuss and he's not getting in a plane, so it's not my business" and walked off, leaving SovCit with a victory. I'm convinced half the "victories" are someone saying, "Oh, life's too short for this nonsense" and kicking the situation down the road in hopes someone else will have to handle the idiots.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Interesting phrasing there. Orange guy "fell victim to" (was Innocent) while blue lady "was guilty".

It's true that we often excuse our own behavior by what we intended, and often blame others based on their behavior without knowing their intent. But that isn't a behavior you might expect from a psychologist determined to analyze a situation, showing a bunch of his own biases.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Marvin, is that you?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 days ago

That's exactly what I was thinking.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I saw some professor online, saying that the first victims of fascists are the true believers of the party they grew out of, and to watch for that happening with the Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 days ago (12 children)

In court, expert psychiatrist Laurent Layet, who interviewed 20 of the accused – including Pelicot three times – said they could not be described as “ordinary men…because that would be tantamount to saying that all men are capable of such acts.”

Yes, and? We choose the bear.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 days ago (3 children)

It's a threat that they could also air the pee tapes.

view more: ‹ prev next ›