They're organised this time
Tagger
joined 1 year ago
*Slightly less than half ~~most~~ of us can, and are stunned by the dumbass other half of the population FTFY
Seems reasonable
The most dangerous time in an abusive relationship is when you try to leave it.
*Max's penalty for VSC violation takes him down to 4th place.
Yeah, but ranked choice isn't in operation, so you've got to make the better choice for right now.
Also, in that case Trump would be the better option. I would hope that in a scenario where the republicans had nominated Hitler that the democrats could do better than Trump but if they couldn't, then yes, voting for Trump in that scenario would be r the right thing to do as voting for, say, Bernie Sanders I. that scenario would let, you know, Hitler become the President.
Yeah, but then, if, say 20% of voters in swing states voted third party, it would let the greater evil in, this being the very immoral choice.
Surely a more relevant measure is what can I do that will do the most good. Voting for someone who is better than the other realistic option, this keeping extremists out of power feels like a more moral option than making a pointless vote.
Abu Dhabi 2021, suck it up.
thanks, it's always nice to see both sides of some data
Can I see the same information under Trump?
yeah, because i'd have been massively unimpressed with Lando's cheating.
Also, because I'm not a Lando fan especially.
view more: next ›
I'm not sure the point I'm meant to take from this. That people who live in worse circumstances and feel marginalised and undersupported are more likely to vote for something they see as a change to the status quo? And that people for whom the status quo is working will continue to support it?