SinAdjetivos

It also needs to be said that the major assumption in the NISVS data is that individuals identifying as lesbian at the time of the study always identified as such and so the perpetrator being referenced couldn't be a man.

Nobody's acting like "nobody supported her". Plenty of people supported her, but she didn't support them and so they should be called by their proper name:

fools

Oof that sucks I'm sorry to hear that. Thank you for explaining that, I was trying to understand where the disagreement was and was getting really confused. Good luck on the recovery!

In every way

You seem to be replying to someone else entirely.

I am saying plainclothes officers are absolutely a form of secret police, and regular police are arguably a form of secret police. I didn't think that before but you and Enkrod have unintentionally made a very strong argument that is the case.

You are correct it's all just word games, but it's a game that seems to have you pretty riled up. Why?

Depends on the patent.

Not how that works, stop talking out of your ass (Gottschalk v. Benson)

It's not "my definition of theft", it's "theft".

You keep switching between moral and legal arguments. They are not the same.

It's like these capitalists of today saying that OSHA needs to go because they're losing profits to it

Deflection

You strike me as

Strawman

you decided to call me an idiot

Literally mirroring your words back at you

Is your face okay after walking into the point that hard and not seeing it?

What does "de jure" mean?

By that definition all police are secret police. Hell, most government workers due to qualified/complete immunity.

de jure unbound by constitutional limits

That by definition makes it lawful and by definition is operating "inside of it".

Taken very seriously while it's economy is in shambles and it's military is depleted to the point of relying on Soviet era relics?