SeriousMite

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Even if it is impossible with the current math, it’d be nice to hear some politicians loudly calling for expanding the court or impeachment. Seems to me if we want to get a strong majority, we need some leadership that actually promises some things people really want. Aside from AOC, nobody seems to want to talk about real ways to fix the court. They seem to be content to just ride it out and hope at some vague point it gets better.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

Important to note that Nate Silver works for Peter Theil, who has donated heavily to Trump pacs, and is responsible for giving us JD Vance.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Seems to me, if you could successfully pull this off and not look like an idiot while pausing to listen to instructions, then that’s pretty impressive in itself and shows the kind of skills coordinating and multitasking that you probably want in a president.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 month ago (3 children)

He works for Peter Theil now, so I take everything he says with a huge grain of salt.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

First we need to shift the Overton window left by repeatedly defeating Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

I think conventional wisdom on political strategy is long overdue for an update.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

“My name is JD Vance and I approve this loveseat.”

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (7 children)

I don’t know. It’s been pretty clear for a while that the traditional Democrat strategy of winning by courting centrists and staying the course has been less and less effective every election. Tapping into enthusiasm for leftist policies and energizing the base to increase turnout has seemed like the better move for a while. That’s what Obama won big on and then completely failed to deliver.

Staying the course with the “nothing will fundamentally change” candidate was always a path to losing, and after his disastrous policy on Gaza we were in a nosedive.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (30 children)

Tim waltz seems like a good pick. Seems to have a bit of the Bernie, no-bullshit, authenticity that plays well with independents.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I would argue that even if your state is guaranteed to go one way or the other (aside from down ballot races which are obviously very important) there’s still value in voting for president, if only to illustrate the discrepancy between the popular vote and the electoral college. The higher we run up the margins, the more it makes it obvious to everyone that we need to ditch the electoral college.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

I don’t know. I think with abortion on the ballot having a woman at the top of the ticket will be a benefit.

view more: next ›