MBech

My thought process is that if you have to mimic a living environment, you still need to include most of what the natural environment needs. The one artificial meat I've read about had the meat growing in vats of some "solution" that mimics the natural environment of the meat (so like a body). Granted, the process in the post may not function like this, but if it does, that process would include:

• Heating, because the meat is actually meat, and the cells require heat to function, which still isn't all that efficient.
• Getting rid of the artificial meat's dead cells and natural waste.
• The "solution" itself I imagine is a funny chemical mix of some sort. So getting those chemicals extracted from their sources. (This one is a bit more iffy, I have no idea what the "solution" is, could be demineralised water with beef stock mixed in for all I know).
• I can't imagine keeping the "solution" as clean as needed for food safety laws around the world is an easy feat coupled with the other points I've listed.

These are all just speculations, please feel free to prove me wrong on any of them, and be sceptical of my list. But this is what I'm sceptical about with the very lacking information in the post.

Very much! And the modding community is doing some absolutely incredible work.

God damn that's an ugly fit on the panels under the window that seemingly haven't fallen off yet.

7 Days to Die. Tried it a few years ago but didn't quite feel it. Now I've played about 150 hours over the last 2 months and am super hooked.

Jamen fedt jeg kunne hjælpe

I didn't find an answer in my very limited search for what is actually used to grow the meat, so depending on what makes up the "stuff" that brings nutrients into the growing part, we may still need a lot of farmers for something like this. There's also no way the growing environment, which seeks to create an artificial "animal", is energyefficient.

I'll celebrate the day we don't need farmers, and I'll celebrate the day it'll be at least environmentally equivolent, but until I see evidence of those things, I'll be very sceptical of this stuff.

What a god damn coward.

Depends on political affiliation. If you're shooting black people protesting, you get the talk-show penalty.

OP, you've been posting a lot of anti-tankie stuff lately. You really gotta chill.

Sure they're increasing their defense spending. But not really in the interest of USA.

USA wanted european defense spending to increase for multiple reasons:

1. To funnel european money into the american military industrial complex.

• This isn't happening right now. Europeans are prioriticing european contractors.

2. To fight in american wars of agression around the world.

• Fat fucking chance when USA is threatening wars of agression against NATO countries.

3. To defend against Russia.

• With Putin owning Trump, this is now against Trump's interests.
• While the threat from Russia is pretty big, they're not in any way in a position to fight anything bigger than Ukraine.

Denmark is currently investing heavily in seamines, ships to handle the seamines and underwater surveillance. Unfortunately I fear it's too little too late, but only time will tell I suppose.

No matter what, the best bet is to make the invasion so costly it won't be worth it for the US.

Then how the fuck else am I supposed to feel superior?