I see a lot in common between Musk and Zuck. They're losers who stole and conned their way to the top of the pyramid, are alone and desperately want the people to like them, all the while doing all they can to hurt that same people. There's a psychiatric can of worms to be untangled somewhere.
Hadriscus
joined 2 weeks ago
That was the case when I was a teen, too
phew. that's enough aggression for one day
That's what the law says in France, at least. People are supposed to cross on crosswalks, but if they don't and a car hits them the driver is at fault regardless. I can try to find a source in english if that's important to you.
Anyway, context is king here and what I didn't specify in my post above is that the space where it happened was quite crowded and ambiguous (especially for an alien like me who had seldom seen a bike lane at the time)
Yea, exactly my point. I'm not denying that I should have been aware of the presence of the bike lane but it falls on the guy on a vehicle to be acutely aware of his surroundings and wary of potential collisions. I say this as a driver and a bicycler
Neither (or both?), it was an overcrowded walkable canal bank in the height of summer with faint paint marks to delimit the path of the bike "lane". I was in the wrong in any case, what I'm complaining about is the dude's reaction. My point is you have to be able to share the space and safely navigate what is inevitably going to be a crowded area at that time of year, especially when riding a bicycle which can be dangerous in its own right.
No no I was on foot
I damn nearly got murdered by an angry speeding cyclist in Paris, near a canal. I crossed the lane without realizing, not being used to their presence. Bike lanes are simply nonexistent where I live, and I was only staying in Paris for a couple weeks. The dude got super mad at me, like super super mad. To this day I still fantasize about throwing him and his fucking bike in the canal. I really should have done it.... why do I have to second-guess everything
Well, I don't know anything more than that.
Sorry I should really make it a habit of quoting my source anytime I make a claim... there is so much disinformation in the air
Mediapart.fr
edit my bad... it was Courrier International, relaying AFP info, itself coming from the PCD (Palestinian Civil Defence, rescue organization), which AFP said they could not independently verify (quoting the article). And it was 76 people not 72 although I don't think at this point it makes much of a difference.
They're terrorists by any definition of the term, jihadists suggests they adhere to the idea of jihad which seems a little far fetched