FunnyUsername

My 300$ earbuds can play two sources at once. But an uncompressed signal? Fuck yourself.

They are laundering the creative works of humans. That's it. The end. They are laundering machines for art. They should be treated and legislated as such.

I stupid. Is there somewhere that says everything this does?

Not me. I'm pretty normal. I call it sober #2.

The paramount+ app doesn't even know how to properly hide the pause icon after you hit resume ffs. It's been months.

Sounds like the photographic equivalent of doping

The supposed contents of the infamous "pee tape"

I think plants are a little less cool now that cloning is so easy and prevalent. It's great you can get anything for cheap now, but it does make things feel less special to me. More trivial.

Iunno, man. If you ask me, they're just laundering emotions. Not producing any new or interesting feelings. There is no empathy, it's only a mirror. But I hope you and your AI live a long happy life together.

I played Beavis and Butthead in Virtual Stupidity, 1995 last time i streamed to nobody

Well said. "Art launderers" is the best ai descriptor I've come across so far.

I absolutely can. Parody is an art form, which is something that can exclusively only be created by human beings. AI is an art laundering service. Not an artist.

The law should reflect that these companies need to be first granted permission to use datasets by the rights holders, and creative commons licenses need to be given an opportunity to opt out of being crawled for these datasets. Anything else is wrong. Machines are not humans. Creative common copyright law was not written with the concept of machines being "consumers". These companies took advantage of the sudden emergence of these models and the delay of law in holding their hunger for data in check. They need to be held accountable for their theft.