EmilyIsTrans

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 53 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The computer is probably locked down and all software/os provisioned by their IT department

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This is the comment that tipped the maintainer over the edge:

ayan4m1

You should do a better job updating your documentation so that people do not waste their time like I did. This change to closed source was announced where, exactly? All of your READMEs and documentation sites do not mention this. Very easy to be confused and very disappointing to me that this went closed-source.

Not only did you sell out, you also removed all the old versions that were released under an open source license so that others couldn't continue to use out-of-support versions. DISGUSTING.

tl;dr get off GitHub and npm entirely if you want to do the closed-source thing, kthx.

Which is incredibly disrespectful in my opinion, and this kind of entitlement is what makes me weary of starting any open source projects.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Go to your local transfem meetup

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

Seattle and Redmond. So Amazon and Microsoft?

[–] [email protected] 94 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Naming your chatbot Arya(n) is a red flag

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ok, so functionally reddit points, or a board of editors. Revolutionary.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Are you seriously suggesting that fucking reddit karma is how we should run our news.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

Ok, so they do that. Here are some things that can plausibly go wrong:

  • Are the people posting the story funding thing anonymous? Because if they are, no one will fund it based on a one line description with no details. If the authors are known, any company engaging in the practice will be watching them like a hawk (essentially making investigation impossible)
  • The company engaging in the practice assumes the investigation is aimed at them and temporarily stops double billing until the journalists runs out of budget and everything blows over. They then resume double billing.
  • The company engaging in the practice assumes the investigation is aimed at them and consequently intimidates would-be whistleblowers into staying silent, basically preventing any progress
  • The company intentionally floods "Kickstarter for News" with spurious stories to drown out the item about them
  • The story isn't funded because it doesn't agree with the preconceived notion of enough users, who are only willing to fund content matching their own worldview
  • The story isn't funded because, while people find it is important, more attention was placed on a story that agreed with the preconceived notion of enough users
  • What stories are funded have a huge bias towards the material condition of the wealthy (moreso than now), since they are the only ones with enough disposable income to fund content. Therefore, content focused on the conditions of the poor and marginalised is ironically marginalised
  • Unable to be subsidized by less prestigious entertainment content (like traditional investigative journalism was), the required upfront cost for stories balloons to a size not feasibly collected by donations
  • The wider population becomes apathetic to the platform as a whole (people have actual jobs and lives, and may not have the time to trawl through potential stories for something they want to fund), leaving only the extremely wealthy/powerful to fund stories. As a consequence the media is even more controlled by the elite than it is currently
  • It turns out there was never a story, and those that donated feel burned and are less likely to donate in the future
  • It turns out there was never a story, and, feeling pressure to produce something, the journalists intentionally misconstrue the truth

I think a crowdsourced approach is a great idea, but only in the sense that my tax dollars go to independent news organisations.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (8 children)

That seems like a terrible idea. How are you supposed to properly investigate a story if you have to first disclose the entire lead to the world? Would this not create the same kind of overreaching editorialism that investigative journalists already push against, except now the person doing the editorialising is actually a whole pool of donors?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

I've never heard of progesterone cream, but I definitely wouldn't trust any from Amazon. I take oral progesterone and am very happy with the results

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Just use Kotlin

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)
view more: ‹ prev next ›