Based Pakistan crushing the weapons of genocide.
Mashallah.
Eiren
joined 2 months ago
I can't wait to get SWAT'd because I said something bad about white supremacy.
I wouldn't've gunned down those minors from ethnic minorities if the leftist SJWs didn't have so many pronouns!!!
No water means the entire country dies.
Logically, they should be fully willing to turn India to glass if India try to cut off the water supply.
Nuclear winter is more about dimming than cooling.
Or in other words, it wouldn't offset temperatures that much, but would negatively impact plant growth/farming and thereby lead to global food shortages.
Imperialism is when a country has a foreign policy.
...Or that's what libs seem to think.
Which actually does their cause more harm, if you remember the Israelis acquired the land through genocide then, too.
One person's gross is another person's based.
I know, despite general racism against south Asians, Hindu supremacists are often treated as "the good ones" within England. Which is to say, I wouldn't be surprised if this is part of a deliberate effort to use India as a proxy to kill more Muslims, without white people taking casualties. That would be on track with how white supremacists usually operate.
What you're failing to even touch upon is that China would still be the seat of civilisation even if it were just them and Russia on one team and everyone else on the other.
The only way possibly around that would be if India became a reliable western ally but the west and India are both so aggressive and rabidly nationalistic at present that they'd probably start killing each other as soon as they felt their other enemies were out of the way.
Because Zionist is descriptor of a member of an ideology without explicit or implicit respect to any claim to ownership or dominion over anything, while Israel is a term which explicitly gives respect to an unfounded and illegal claim for dominion over the lands of Palestine.
Except you can't empathise with a group because groups are conceptual and concepts do not have feelings.
This shit is depressing.
Edit: Actually, this whole thing is bizarre. "empathizing was rated as more effortful and distressing compared to staying objective"? Feelings are objective. Individuals objectively have feelings. Empathy is understanding and weighing other people's feelings, particularly when making decisions. There is absolutely nothing that is not objective about it.
The experimental design also seems to be asking the participants to empathise with people who very obviously don't exist with zero information about their fictional cirtumstances (not even any body language), which is bordering on impossible. I'd also really like to ask how it's "distressing" to try to empathise with an expressionless photograph on a solid background.
Junk research. Whoever approved funding for it should be fired.