I don't have any sympathy for Cook, nor do i think it's a bad verdict, but shooting someone is a pretty extreme response to having a phone held near your face/ear for 20 seconds.
CmdrShepard
joined 1 year ago
Ugh, I have both and now I question what that means about me.
I think 2 spinoffs and 3 movies are planned. Things that probably would have still been relevant 10 years ago.
You're discussing the law and being arrested. Intent absolutely matters in this context which is why I brought up other examples of where intent matters as murder/manslaughter, hate crimes, assault versus self defense, etc. You seem quite confused about a topic that you brought up on your own...
What you're saying here doesn't make any sense. What you said previously made sense but lacked nuance or any deeper understanding of the situation you proposed yourself.
Perhaps you think blatant, ignorant bigotry and "testing freedom of speech" are the same thing, which explains your response, and shows you the reasoning behind mine.
You don't see the difference between these two scenarios? It may benefit you to learn about nuance.
If not being able to buy energy drinks as a kid pushes you to extremism, you were already destined for that to begin with.
Sure it is. Intent is what separates murder from manslaughter for instance. Intent definitely matters here. Why are you having trouble elaborating on that aspect of your hypothetical scenario.
I'm asking what your intentions are behind drawing on a whiteboard outside a mosque in the scenario not what your intentions were behind posing this hypothetical scenario. That part is obvious.
It was about how Gen Z are rejecting "droids" in favor of iPhones
What are your intentions behind doing this in your hypothetical scenario?
"Child free" just sounds like people who don't want kids. "Anti-natalism" sounds like people who don't want kids to exist at all.