this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

32318 readers
910 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (10 children)

To find out where people are willing to draw the line. I've noticed that the people defending this proposed law are giving this question a wide berth.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I'm asking what your intentions are behind drawing on a whiteboard outside a mosque in the scenario not what your intentions were behind posing this hypothetical scenario. That part is obvious.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)

The intention isn’t relevant.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure it is. Intent is what separates murder from manslaughter for instance. Intent definitely matters here. Why are you having trouble elaborating on that aspect of your hypothetical scenario.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fine, two scenarios: first, I’m doing it because I’m Islamophobic. Second, I’m doing it to test the limits of free speech. Can you tell the difference? No. That’s why it’s not relevant.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't see the difference between these two scenarios? It may benefit you to learn about nuance.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It may benefit you to pay attention to what I'm saying. Could you tell the difference?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What you're saying here doesn't make any sense. What you said previously made sense but lacked nuance or any deeper understanding of the situation you proposed yourself.

Perhaps you think blatant, ignorant bigotry and "testing freedom of speech" are the same thing, which explains your response, and shows you the reasoning behind mine.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh boy. No, I don't think they are the "same thing" I'm saying you can't infer motivation just by observing therefore the motivation isn't relevant. Try and keep up, or don't.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're discussing the law and being arrested. Intent absolutely matters in this context which is why I brought up other examples of where intent matters as murder/manslaughter, hate crimes, assault versus self defense, etc. You seem quite confused about a topic that you brought up on your own...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

You're not thinking clearly. Intent is irrelevant, it can't be known in this example. Got it?

Just in case, here it is again. Intent is irrelevant.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)