[Gentile] landlords extorted Jewish refugees, demanding hefty fees in exchange for keys needed to access vacant flats. Still others fought with [gentile] occupants who refused to leave their dwellings despite [government] demands. Amidst the chaos, some ghetto dwellings housed ten to fifteen people. The dramatic increase in population density for Jews in the ghetto acted as a psychological assault intended to unsettle and disorient new ghetto residents.
(Source.)
How do we know that this isn’t scaremongering?
Baselessly accusing Haitians of stealing pets and eating them is blood libel. Baselessly accusing Caribbeans of eating each other is blood libel. Showing the world evidence of Herzlians massacring civilians is not! Enact a ceasefire and stop pretending that an apartheid régime somehow represents Jews. It really isn’t that much to ask.
I sure would like to disappear right now.
I have to admit that I chuckled when I saw your thread since the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia tends to be a heated topic for socialists, but to answer your question: it depends on your criteria. If you define communism as a classless, stateless, moneyless existence distinct from socialism, then the SFRY wasn’t communist, but you could say that about any other people’s republic, and I think that that’s a moot, uninteresting point to make anyway.
If you define socialism as the negation of capitalism — that is to say, the negation of capital, the law of value, and generalised commodity production — then I’d categorize the SFRY as merely presocialist (as silly as it may sound to call a self‐described Socialist Republic ‘presocialist’).
After the Soviet stance on the Greek civil war alienated the Yugoslavs, the SFRY adopted a sort of semiplanned economy where market mechanisms continued to exist (hence why some pro‐Soviet communists consider the SFRY capitalist). This was not so much because Yugoslav politicians now rejected scientific socialism, but because the SFRY’s isolation from the rest of the Eastern Bloc made it an inevitability. There is a great book titled Class Struggle in Socialist Poland that delves into the subject of the SFRY’s market mechanisms, but I can’t give you a link yet since Archive.org is partially down.
The lower classes won some very important gains because of the SFRY (as they did in the other people’s republics), so as much as I can sympathize with the left communist tendency to categorise these republics as ‘capitalist’, I can’t heap scorn on them either. That would be like rolling my eyes at strikers for winning concessions when they ‘really’ should be abolishing capitalism, but now I’m just rambling.
Polish antisocialists are trying to beat the Zionists in the racist Olympics, I see.
The way that ordinary Americans feel about homeless people is only a step or two removed from how Herzlians feel about Palestinians.
On September 12 Hitler made a speech in Nuremburg accusing the Czech government of atrocities against the Sudeten Germans, including forcing them from their homes and attempting to exterminate them.
(Source.)
The [Reich’s] press was full of invective against Beneš and the Czechs, and of reports of alleged Czech atrocities committed against a peaceful and defenceless German population. Every tavern brawl was magnified into a massacre; every time a [Fascist] schoolboy cheeked a Czech gendarme and was given a clip on the ear the [Reich’s] press reported streams of blood.
That better?
In a recording of the Friday meeting leaked to Channel 12, a daughter of one of the hostages can be heard telling the prime minister, “You can be remembered as the one who led the country to a better place or as the one who wreaked havoc here. You are the prime minister and you are responsible for the abductees, not Hamas and not anyone else. You are supposed to reach a deal that will bring all the abductees.”
Avichai Brodetz, whose wife, Hagar, and three children, Ofri, Yuval, and Uriah, are being held hostage, yelled at Likud Member of Knesset Boaz Bismuth on television, “Do you know why my family was kidnapped? Not because of Hamas. Because there was no army there to protect me […] The problem is you, not Hamas.”