Aegeus

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Thanks for the feedback!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Has anyone read the Unearthed Arcana for bastions? Is it good?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Make this a level 15 ability for fighters and then emigrate so that the caster inquisition won‘t crucify you for doing it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Rules option for DnD 5E, specifically for legendary and mythical monsters that tend to be the ones with the most HP:

'Attacks from legendary or mythical monsters hit automatically if they require an attack roll and the effects of the attack would not give the target a condition. Legendary resistances of monsters can only be used against effects that can be assigned to the spell schools abjuration, illusion, transformation or enchantment. Otherwise, monsters can still use their Legendary Resistance to pass saving throws against any effect that would give the monster one or more conditions. In case of doubt, the DM decides. After a monster has used Legendary Resistance, its movement rate is halved until the end of its next turn. The damage caused by the monster's attacks that require attack rolls is also halved until the end of the monster's next turn after using Legendary Resistance.

(These rules can ensure that battles are both shorter and more exciting due to the higher damage dealt by both sides. The battles also become more dangerous, making PCs think twice about taking the risk. Creativity is encouraged when considering alternative strategies for conflict resolution. Both ensure that there will be fewer battles overall, which remain the most time-consuming scenes in the game. The increased risk also makes combat itself more creative when searching for ways to damage the enemy or use the environment for a tactical advantage. It also encourages the player characters to improve their supply of healing options, e.g. through the help of NPCs that can cast healing spells.)'

Scribbled together based on this post and its comments as well as some additional ideas I've had.

EDIT: Fixed something that got lost in automatic translation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Interesting, I had the opposite impression regarding the number of dragons. RoT was part of a longer campaign that is still going on, and I always find myself struggling to put another dragon into the game because we already had so many of them, lol.

Overall I loved our time with RoT, picking only some of the cooler given missions and substituting the others with some stuff I had written up myself. So they got to fight a beholder (Xanathar) in its natural environment (Waterdeep) when they had an appropriate level to make the encounter a challenge. Also giving them the chance to obtain the White Wyrmspeaker Mask that had found its way to Xanathar‘s Guild.

Sadly, the module offered no possibility to interact with both Severin and the possible ally faction of giants before the final fight. Solution: Diplomatic showdown to convince a cloud giant of their respective cause. Along with a full-grown battle in the dorms.

Mammon saving the PCs‘ asses from a green dragon following a pact made in a swamp cleared for refugees; the Black Wyrmspeaker as a double-agent who tried to overtake the Cult… God, I loved those ten months. I even got to use the labyrinth from Xonthal‘s Tower at a later point in the campaign because it didn‘t go with our very own version of RoT.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Did one of your spellcasters know the Gate spell? If so, what stopped the PCs from pulling the BBEG out of their lair and beating them up from the comfort of their homes? I'm having trouble coming up with challenges that don't actively oppose the abilities of high-level PCs. Just saying 'no' and refusing to let a spell take normal effect would very likely seem unfair, no matter how logical the in-game explanation might seem.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I like your approach to speed up combat, although I inevitably will have to look up stuff and I would understand if my players would view it as unfair if only they have to skip their turn while this wouldn't apply to NPCs.

We have repeatedly debated the matter of spells for almost a year while never quite reaching a consensus. I understand your opinion on winning D&D, I just think that the game will not be able to develop any depth anymore if the preparation can't be relied on, being replaced by an inflation of poorly thought through plot hooks made up on the spot.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

We will dive into that style of play as well, yes. But there are perils left in the game world that can't be taken care of by lower-level NPC adventurers. Thanks for your feedback!

 

Hope I'm right here with this, sorry if the question is too specific for this community.

Our long-term D&D campaign has reached PC level 17. Now's the time for implementing mechanics that fasten up combat (we all don't like how long it takes), as well as addressing spells that the GM (me) fears to be game-breaking (mostly 9th level spells, full list below).

Sooo... I'd be thankful for any helpful suggestions. My current ideas for the combat aspect include shock damage, Instinct and Morale checks from Worlds Without Number, but those probably don't suffice yet. And I'm having trouble conveying to the spellcasters that toning down some spells is necessary in order to maintain a functional game that doesn't tear apart hours of preparation every session. Feel free to point out any potential counter-arguments to my view on that as well.

I'm really determined to keep this game running. Thank you all so much in advance!

List of spells that require revision or more exact definition (in my opinion): Wish, Meteor Swarm, Invulnerability, Gate, True Polymorph, Leomund's Tiny Hut, Rope Trick