AdrianTheFrog

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I find ChatGPT useful in getting my server to work (since I'm pretty new with Linux)

Other than that, I check in on how local image models are doing around once every couple of months. I would say you can achieve some cool stuff with it, but not really any unusual stuff.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Oh, I had some of those last year on some lemmy thread somewhere.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

honestly, its pretty good, and it still works if I use a lower resolution screenshot without metadata (I haven't tried adding noise, or overlaying something else but those might break it). This is pixelwave, not midjourney though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

If I pay $60 for a game, I want to be able to play it in at least 10 years, not just 3.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 week ago (9 children)

shocking: users of open-source reddit alternative like open-source things

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Probably TMNF lol

Unless you like unreasonable subscription models

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

Can't you do that with any search engine?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Archinstall is super easy. Just copy a few commands from the wiki to join a wifi network and then it will take everything from there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

quick test, with that prompt and flux schnell gguf 4 bit again:

  • pentagon: 1
  • hexagon: 9
  • heptagon: 2
  • octagon: 7
  • decagon: 1

it seems a lot stupider than pro lol

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I thought this couldn't be true, so using one of the newer models (4bit flux) I told it to make a 5 sided star, and then put lines around the outside

lol this is very weird, did they forbid it from looking at pentagons in the training data or something? it can't do The Pentagon either, it gives it 8-12 sides instead

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

If firefox becomes worse or starts lagging behind more, I'll stop using it. It doesn't seem all that useful to attempt to predict 5 years into the future Firefox's state and therefore decide to switch away now.

 

This is at JFK, does anyone know what they are used for? There wasn’t an obvious time when it was taking a picture.

207
Rule (lemmy.world)
 
 

Prompt: A cyberpunk scifi painting of a floating city in the air above the sea

It uses a new, fancier, 18GB text encoder (t5) to follow the prompt much more closely. It isn't perfect, but its much better than SDXL in my opinion. It does seem to be a bit worse at photorealistic subjects and has a tendency to create 1-pixel vertical lines.

Some other images:

impressionist, a woman sits in the middle of a crowded cyberpunk street, people bustling around, orange and blue glowing signs, warm atmosphere

a bright cinematic photo of a solarpunk city at midday, skyscrapers, steel, glass, vines and fields of vivid tropical plants

 

Runs at around 300 FPS on my RTX 3060, WITH realtime global illumination enabled (sdfgi). Sadly still not fast enough for the scene to be playable in VR on my hardware - at least not at native resolution.

Some additional screenshots:

I'm pretty new to Godot, and the tower is a model I made for a different project. This is an updated version of the scene I posted here a couple of months ago. I'm posting this to show that you can achieve some pretty nice graphical fidelity in Godot - and you don't need to be a professional artist or have tons of Godot expertise to do it.

 

I'm using SDFGI and TAA for this scene, the one strange thing I've noticed is that rough metallic surfaces like that sphere can look odd, most of it is rough but there are some sharp lines, not realistic behavior for a surface like that. You can see the reflection of the sun is blurred, most of the scene is blurred, but you still get some sharp lines for some reason. This only seems to happen with roughness values between 0.1 and 0.2, a roughness value of 0 looks fine. I'm getting 210-220 FPS in this scene on a 3060 at 1080p.

view more: next ›