this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
322 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

60303 readers
3026 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Every robot should have some kind of electronic blinker to let others know they're robots. That way, we can avoid a bunch of bumps and crashes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

We could always consider reaching out to Harrison Ford for a classic bot chase.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago

Begun, the robot wars have.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 5 days ago (3 children)

There should be an open communication standard that all robots use to communicate with each other.

And it will only be used for good and nothing nefarious.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How about if we had sixteen different proprietary such protocols instead?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We’d need a seventeenth unifying protocol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Aside from the obvious I, Robot movie allusion, this idea doesn't really work in the real world because robots have to be able to detect the presence and anticipate the actions of non-robots anyway. Unless you're willing to ban all the actual people from the street, which is unreasonable, robot-to-robot communication doesn't actually help you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Put common channel com devices on all people too. Solved!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Robots can look different to people, if they know where each other are then they csn prioritise a collision with a robot over a human etc.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

There should be an open communication standard that all robots use to communicate with each other.

Yes!

And it will only be used for good and nothing nefarious.

Oh no

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I see nobody talking about this, but aren't the Waymo(s) trained on data which most likely did not include these robots yet?

It seems like this is just something that'll probably happen a lot whenever something new is introduced on the roads.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Expect reCaptcha to ask you to identify food delivery robots soon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Wouldn't be surprised tbh.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't know about the equipment of Waymo cars, but I would be surprised if they didn't have LIDARs or some other form of distance based environment detection.

And that should be sufficient to implement basic obstacle detection. You don't need to use machine learning if you can use sensors telling you that "something is too close".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

The article title is misleading as usual.

The car collided after hitting the brakes, seems there wasn't any real damage. It seems the system is designed to only lessen the impact when it detects the obstacle as non-human. If it would have recognized the robot as human, it would have probably acted differently.

Better to hit the object and lessen the impact than to fully brake/avoid and risk worse.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

but aren't the Waymo(s) trained on data which most likely did not include these robots yet?

You can say that about nearly 100% of humans as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

So I'm finding it hard to find a release date for humans, but I'm fairly sure they predated the invention of self-driving cars.

For example I seem to remember being alive in the 1990s

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Well, they should try to avoid any object in the road to be honest. Imagine a new toy comes out that a child is on. Sorry we killed that child l, we didn't train it on that new toy.

Its just an unacceptable answer to be honest.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

That is also very true.

It's not a Tesla so I'm sure they are investigating the cause.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

We can discuss now who had the right of way.

But can we?

Do robots suddenly have rights?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 days ago

You call that a smash? Stop sensationalising, come now.

A car gently tapped a thing during a turn and came to a stop.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

That was personal, there's definitely some beef between them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

This new season of Robot Wars / Battle Bots is starting strong

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 days ago (2 children)

video of it on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hazFkED40KI if you don't want to go to reddit through the linked page

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Hey, it actually stopped without plowing on very far at all. That's better than what I expected to happen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Don't really want to go to YouTube either, but thank you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah everyone knows the best crash videos are on liveleak

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago

Where were you during the robot wars of 2025?

load more comments
view more: next ›