this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
47 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37713 readers
400 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

RoboRock FTW

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Smoke a cigar and celebrate. Obviously it sucks for those laid off, but its clear that the EU is saving the world.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I don't want every single company to merge into the big 3 I actually want competition

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

“Now what?” == Layoffs apparently. About 350 people or 31% of iRobot’s staff.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I hate articles with headlines like this. "Now what?". Well, I'm gonna keep on shitting, I don't really care what either company chooses to do

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago (2 children)

god, I hate the way TechCrunch is rendering on my phone.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

except that I'm using Firefox.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

View it in desktop mode

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

My apologies.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It renders a lot better on my phone, but this is why reader mode is a necessary feature for browsing the web on a smartphone.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Responsive design was a neat idea, but has failed in the context of the modern web and tech industry.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

It seems like you don’t understand what responsive design is.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

That's not responsive design's fault. When done properly, it works great. Too many sites just implement it poorly and insist on the CVS receipt layout even on mobile (e.g. recursive CVS receipts). Gotta cram those margins full of ads, ya know?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

When done properly it is indeed a great practice.

But so many don't. The way the modern tech industry functions makes it hard to consistently get right, sadly. I've left two companies in the past two years where computational resources for automated testing and validation were simply not available. One didn't have any manual QA beyond the implementing developer. I'm in a better situation now, but those companies still exist. They're not exactly tiny startups either.

For all its strengths, without any amount of validation, RWD is very likely to lead to such issues. Unfortunately many industry execs are unsympathetic, seeing RWD as little more than a way to get two things for the price of one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Looks like they're using fat margins instead of max-width and nobody thought to use media queries to reduce them on mobile...

Edit: I should add the page renders fine on my phone, FF android. I'm not sure what's going on in the screenshot, maybe desktop view?