this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

News

28478 readers
4862 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new report from Americans for Tax Fairness found that America’s richest families accumulated $8.5 trillion in untaxed capital gains in 2022

America’s wealthiest families held an astounding $8.5 trillion in untaxed profits in 2022. According to a report from the nonprofit Americans for Tax Fairness, which analyzed Federal Reserve data, “one in every six dollars (18 percent of the nation’s unrealized gains is held by these roughly 64,000 ultra-wealthy households, who make up less than 0.05 percent of the population.” The report comes as the Supreme Court gears up to decide a case that could preemptively block any efforts to tax the wealth of billionaires.

The data looks at “quiet” income generated by “centi-millionaires,” Americans holding at least $100 million in wealth, and billionaires through unrealized capital gains. Those gains accumulate, untaxed, as assets and investments like stocks, real estate, bonds, and other investments increase in value. If those assets are not sold — or “realized” — they are not taxed, yet America’s wealthiest families can leverage that on-paper value increase to secure favorable loans with low-interest rates in lieu of using taxable income to finance their lifestyle.

“Of the $139 trillion in America’s national wealth, almost three-quarters (73 percent) is held by the richest 10 percent of households, over one-third (35 percent) by the richest 1 percent, and an astounding 11 percent — $15.2 trillion — is held by the handful of fortunate households that make up the billionaire and centi-millionaire class,” the report says. “The wealthiest 1 percent of households hold 44 percent of national unrealized gains ($21.2 trillion), with billionaires and centi-millionaires alone controlling 18 percent ($8.5 trillion).”

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] quindraco@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The solution here isn't to tax unsold goods, it's to tax the banks on all the income they're getting from these loans.

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The solution here isn’t to tax unsold goods

Why not? People are taxed for unrealized gains on a house. Why should stocks be any different?

[–] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One argument could be that anything that incentivizes people to sell their stocks isn't a good thing

The more people buying and selling at any given time, the more volatile the price could become, it's so easy to buy and sell stocks that we already have to have high frequency trading disincentives by having a really high capital gains tax on stocks that were held for a short period of time

Property is a lot less volatile, and there's already a rather large natural incentive to hold on to it for long periods of time (moving is a pain), and taxing unrealized gains on it (essentially, paying estimated taxes on a theoretical future sale) is unlikely to really motivate anyone to sell their house

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

This is just pearl clutching for billionaires and an economy that doesn't work for the majority of U.S. citizens.

[–] Shadywack@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The solution is simple. Murder them and all their heirs. Begin a new Bastille Day.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"But what if I become rich... I should vote against my best interests just in case."

In terms of unrealised gains, that's kind of a tricky one. They certainly do benefit massively from unrealised gains though, like anyone would on paper.

[–] jasondj@ttrpg.network 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do these nimcompoops realize that the existing wealthy elite, few in their number, got that way by exploiting social safetynets and taxpayer funded infrastructure for their gains?

So cleary, if we want to be able to generate more wealth and more millionaires/billionaires, better social programs and infrastructure will get them there. Imagine how much easier it’ll be to become wealthy if you don’t have to give employees insurance, or tuition reimbursement? Or if there’s an amazing system of roads, rails, and ports to move your goods to consumers? God, you could become a successful businessman and still have a conscious. Best of both worlds.

[–] calypsopub@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

TBF we are talking about unrealized gains. Their investments are worth more on paper, but until they sell them, the actual profit or loss will fluctuate. It would be an accounting nightmare to figure tax on unsold investments every year. I do, however, think capital gains should be taxed at the same rate as wage income.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They should be forced to sell, that is the point. Accounting is complicated because people want to hide wealth. None of this is actually complicated it's just been made complex.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

It's a good thing ZERO Justices have taken luxurious trips and gifts paid for by these same exact billionaires that could inject literally TRILLIONS into our communities!

[–] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is how you get nobility. Before Reagan, wealth typically dissipated by the third generation. We are heading toward the old European model, where families are rich for a millennium.

[–] Myro@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Exactly. They may not call themselves nobility but their influence is the same if not more.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Hopefully we can also head for the other old European model of dealing with them that the French popularized.

[–] crsu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Billionaires are the real welfare queens

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

And yet people who want raises are the drag on the fucking economy.

[–] Norgur@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When has the US turned into a regime led by the supreme court? All my life, whenever something was up, you heard what the president did or tried to do or whatever. Nowadays, all headlines about the US are about something the Supreme Court with it's undemocratically elected judges gets to decide over all lawmaker's heads.

[–] clgoh@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Supreme Court has been powerful for a long time.

Since the early 19th century.

https://www.history.com/news/supreme-court-power-john-marshall

[–] Coach@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

roughly 64,000 ultra-wealthy households

Get your forks and knives ready, fam. We'll be eatin' good, soon.

[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There are only a bit over 3,000 billionaires. That would hardly fill us up.

[–] Coach@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

But afterwards, I've heard...we eat cake.