this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
449 points (92.8% liked)

Mod Abuse Hotline

151 readers
1 users here now

A safe space to report and discuss the daily abuses of power that occur on the Lemmy.

Naughty List:

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

For the record I was posting in support of inclusive language, but pointing out that context and convention matter.

They seem to have even scrubbed my comment from their instance, lol.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 5 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 5 months ago (10 children)

I'm just glad I'm not the only one who views dude as androgynous.

I thought I was one of the few.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I was banned from a community called, "Pleasant Politics," that I had never heard of or interacted with, but honestly, as a preemptive move, fair enough.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Oh that place is an interesting idea but poor execution.

Last I knew they would ban you if you got banned from any of the news comms or had too many controversial comments. Which just boiled down to downvotes

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Hmm, well, I wasn't banned from anything before that, and none of my comments had been highly downvoted. I had gotten in a few people's faces over genocide denial, though. I assumed it was because of that.

Funny enough, I just double-checked, and it looks like I've recently been banned from a bunch of Dubvee communities, too. I've never heard of this instance before, but based on this post, I'm guessing they didn't like my thoughts on United Healthcare. Again, I wasn't even aware of Dubvee until now, so I can't say it feels like much of a loss.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I remember the creator of the bot that does the bans insisted until he was blue in the fact that it doesn't ban based on downvotes while spewing a lot f technobabble that ultimately ammounted to banning for downvotes. So yeah, he's trying to bring back one of the worse features of Reddit, that being an ass kissing requirement, that's what karma requirements are, they are an ass kissing requirement, because the way you get karma points is by kissing ass, the way you lose them is by sharing new or different ideas. See the issue with them? The system punishes people for having ideas that other people don't like, not that are wrong or evil, but that other people simply don't like. That's not even mentioning people who cheat the system by doing vote manipulation to their own comments or to other comments.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I understand the reddit karma requirements, having seen too many small subs get swarmed by x day old but no or only negative karama but yeah that creator didn't seem to want anything polite, just acceptable to status quo thinking

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

until he was blue in the fact

This phrase is genius.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

I don't even like IKEA.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

So much for "inclusivity"

[–] [email protected] 36 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The key is that you said "but..." which in some communities fails the test of absolute 100% agreement and makes you The Enemy. I had a very similar experience there, in my case it was saying someone who is "uncomfortable" with gender issues might not actually "hate" anybody, they could just be having trouble overcoming how they were raised. But in the end it's like if a TV channel stops but you get thousands of other channels, so oh well .

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›