this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
683 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

68567 readers
3463 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 5) 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago

Spotify was my penultimate subscription. Still have to bring my AWS Lightsail instances back in house. :(

Yeah, enshitification indeed. Was quite happy 4 years ago. Worth $10/mo. to get what I want and some new stuff occasionally thrown in. Suggested music tracked my tastes, easy UI, all that.

Then they upped it $1. Fine. Then I started getting all sort of bullshit when my playlist ran out. "Fuck was that?!"

Now that I cancelled the paid version, the ads are killing me. Look, I'm a GenXer, accustomed to ads for free TV and radio. I'm fine with that revenue model. But fuck me, just like modern radio, the ads became so thick as to be distracting. And of course I can't use it in the deep woods where my internet is sketchy.

I download all my playlists. FOSS I can use to upload and play that on my phone? Guess I'm back to pirating.

[–] [email protected] 103 points 3 months ago (3 children)

There's a reason why artists have to sell 50$ t-shirts at shows. Back in the days, the label would leech you dry, and now it's Spotify, on top of your label

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Everyone always gave me shit for sticking with Pandora. It can basically do all the shit that Spotify can these days albeit a little different. You can even make your own playlists and listen offline if you have premium. It has a more limited library but it's barely noticeable except maybe once or twice a year I can't find a song I wanna listen to. It's simpler and cheaper than Spotify with most of the same features. My favorite part is that I can literally pick any song I want and it will just continue playing after it's over with similar songs. I've discovered so much music I would have never tried if it hadn't shown up. And so far it hasn't been overrun by AI slop like Spotify. Sure they pay artists less compared to competitors but at least they aren't just straight up trying to replace them.

I'm not saying Pandora is objectively better. I'm just saying Spotify is falling into the world of enshittification and there are many alternatives out there. You could even just buy music and support artists directly like we used to.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Devils advocate moment... If people keep listening (or sort of listening) and they are OK with music that seems to lack any soul, is it not just giving the audience what they want and deserve?

Devils concierge moment... What a bunch of shitbags.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 months ago (8 children)

The only people who make money on Spotify is Spotify. Support artists directly if you want them to continue to create.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Thats some pretty bad stuff: https://open.spotify.com/playlist/3wLm5nlYrHkbd29ilMRq89?nd=1&dlsi=50e31b2329204ddd

its all the same song as the article states.

[–] [email protected] 92 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The last and only truth I needed to know about Spotify was it's 250 million dollar deal with Joe Rogan, who is antivax incel cancer, and that was it for me. No need to learn or know any more about them.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Normies love some Rogan he shills Russian propaganda to them!

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago

Just like Fuckface 45 is the normal man's idea of a rich man, Rogan is the normal man's idea of a smart man.

And wrong on both accounts.

[–] [email protected] 170 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I mean they paid Joe Rogan $100 million dollars so they have already wrecked their reputation.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Ngl, I canceled them and haven’t gone back since. Don’t really miss it much, I try to use the same cost as my subscription to buy music every month on CD when I can.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

I just want to remind people that you may still have a used CD store in your city, also 2nd hand stores for CDs. They tend to be quite cheap these days.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I have recently discovered Qobuz (French company). You can purchase digital music. They aren't cheap, but they have selection and hi-res music (sometimes 24 bit).

But good on you for the CDs, too!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago

didn't they sue someone for doing this on his own? I guess they want to be the only ones doing it.

[–] [email protected] 254 points 3 months ago (4 children)

From the article:

"...journalist Liz Pelly has conducted an in-depth investigation, and published her findings in Harper’sβ€”they are part of her forthcoming book Mood Machine: The Rise of Spotify and the Costs of the Perfect Playlist.

...

"Now she writes:

'What I uncovered was an elaborate internal program. Spotify, I discovered, not only has partnerships with a web of production companies, which, as one former employee put it, provide Spotify with β€œmusic we benefited from financially,” but also a team of employees working to seed these tracks on playlists across the platform. In doing so, they are effectively working to grow the percentage of total streams of music that is cheaper for the platform.'

In other words, Spotify has gone to war against musicians and record labels."

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Can someone explain why this is bad? It seems like normal behaviour of corporations.

Or has spotify previously committed to being a fair market?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago

The normal behavior of corporations IS bad. By definition.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Unfair competition.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

IANAL but it seems akin to the antitrust case against Microsoft for bundling their own web browser in with Windows or movie studios also owning theaters and giving preferential treatment to their own films.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 3 months ago (3 children)

This is like a soup joint that's trying to see how much they can piss in the broth before customers notice.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Better check the TOS doesn't include acceptance of various concentrations of piss..

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That would be a health hazard, so it's not really comparable.

It seems more like a soup joint using cheaper ingredients in their dishes, which is just... normal? I don't get what the big deal is.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It's normal if you accept it. You do not have to accept it. There's also a good chance that it's illegal in Spotify's case, if not in the US then likely in Europe.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 156 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Once they get maket shared they start extracting...

To normal people this is called enshitification

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This should theoretically at least be illegal, as they abuse the power of the platform to favor certain tracks unfairly.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Any action would require a government that pretends to care for the pedons.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Spotify is AFAIK Swedish, so there you go.

PS:
I guess you mean peons.
Pedons is apparently types of soil: https://www.britannica.com/science/pedon

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί