this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
1271 points (97.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

6024 readers
1876 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 59 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 14 hours ago

Is that why he wears diapers?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

This is just homophobia, by the way

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (9 children)

This is just homophobia, by the way

Tell us you are not a gay man without telling us you are not a gay man.

Edit: Probably 85% of my social circle is some delicious flavor of queer. Kinda comes with being queer I guess. We make these jokes in part to normalize this sexuality and to make fun of hypocrites and bullies. It's the same thing as when the kid in school says "that's so gay" and you reply "oh really? You wanna get together later?". This has come up a few times - the sensitivity of some groups to these kinds of jokes - and the conclusion is basically that people who object to them are generally either not queer or insecure about being queer and want to exert control over the conversation either to get cred with the community or to assuage their fears.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Oh please do fuck off with that shit, Karen.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 14 hours ago

I remember when calling someone a Karen was a word with a meaning, specifically calling out bigoted white women - those who would punch down. This is the opposite; someone calling out bigotry.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 17 hours ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

Assuming good faith question: The (false) dichotomy of top/bottom implies a power dynamic in which the bottom is subservient to the top. In reality, it's often a simple preference and bottoms can domineer just as well as tops. Some prefer it that way. And there's more than top and bottom. Versatile is the obvious third option (no or changing preference for position) as well as side (prefers non-penetrative sex).

There's this stereotype (may not be the right word) that extends from the above in that tops are more masculine or powerful by virtue of topping, due to the tie with being dominant. Thus bottoms are more feminine and subservient. All of that is false and represents the gay community in a pretty bad, oversimplified, sexist-somewhere-along-the-line way.

The dom/sub axis is not the same as the top/bottom axis (not really an axis).

[–] [email protected] -1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This is just absolutely ridiculous. It's thought police over-engineering for clout.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

It's a dissection of why some people in the LGBT community may be offended. If you're unwilling to try to see the perspective of others and choose to instead reject empathy, that's a problem for you and the people around you. This internet stranger will continue to have a good day.

Also, clout? On Lemmy? Oh good, I've got the support of all 12 of us...

[–] [email protected] -3 points 12 hours ago (18 children)

It’s a dissection of why some people in the LGBT community may be offended. If you’re unwilling to try to see the perspective of others

I don't think you see the hypocrisy in your own comments.

Empathy would be you not trying to tell people what to think and say and being willing to see their perspective.

Also, clout? On Lemmy? Oh good, I’ve got the support of all 12 of us…

Hey maybe that's meaningful to you. It certainly seems to be to many.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but the joke here is turning the dumb jokes of the homophobes against them, right? Calling a homophobe "haha u'r gay n a bottom" is kinda using their homophobia against them, no?

Also, I'm gay myself. If someone said "haha, u like taking it up the ass", I would be like, "sure I do!". Say this to a homophobe n they would be incredibly offended. So ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

But sure, I get why the morals of this aren't so straightforward.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago

You aren't wrong. It's rather philosophical at that point. There's the "don't say it because it's shitty angle" (quasi-mine, though mine was more a explanation vs a held belief) vs the "take it back from them" angle. Both have pros/cons and I'm not going to pretend I have the 'perfect' answer. The truth is probably that whichever is more effective/least damaging probably varies by context.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

It’s not just the top/bottom part that’s problematic, it’s the entire post. The punchline is “Trump and Elon are gay for each other, isn’t that funny?” which centers the idea that it would be bad or wrong for them to be gay for each other, perpetuating the conservative stereotype that there’s something wrong with being gay.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 13 hours ago (19 children)

Oh FFS.

We (gay people) have been pointing out the hypocrisy of homophobes with this sort of joke for ages and will continue to do it because it's fucking hilarious. We are, in doing so, celebrating that it's wonderful to be gay and sad that they don't see that or see there at times in-the-closet-like behavior.

The last thing thing I need is a bunch of word police telling me what I can and cannot say.

You know who IS making it seem like there's something wrong with being gay? People like you.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

As a “joke” it treats being gay as derogatory. You’re welcome to make shitty homophobic jokes if you want to.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 12 hours ago (11 children)

Are you gay?

Are you not ok with being gay if you are? Are you not and experiencing latent homophobia?

Because that's the only way you can possible conclude that it's derogatory to call someone gay.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago

Good call, I missed it. We've got layers of shittiness in this meme.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

you really can't see how using sexuality to mock someone you hate is homophobic?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

you really can’t see how using sexuality to mock someone you hate is homophobic?

It's not using sexuality to mock someone. It's using hypocrisy to mock someone.

You know what's the same thing? When gay men call each other fags or lesbians dykes. It's taking what was intended as derogatory and flipping it around to celebrate it. It's the ideal response to bullying assholes of any kind.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's not using sexuality to mock someone. It's using hypocrisy to mock someone.

I guess it would make it okay to call a black right-winger an N-word and talk about how he can't swim and only eats chicken and watermelon, then?

When gay men call each other fags or lesbians dykes

and I'm sure you know that not everyone is comfortable doing that because of their lived experiences. it's awesome that homophobic jokes don't affect you, but not everyone can distance themselves from them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago

I guess it would make it okay to call a black right-winger an N-word and talk about how he can’t swim and only eats chicken and watermelon, then?

If you are black, yes, it would be ok. And many black people do. It's the exact same defense mechanism.

and I’m sure you know that not everyone is comfortable doing that because of their lived experiences.

Then let them not be comfortable with it and let me and my people alone. Do not try to police my language just because perceive someone somewhere to have experienced some mild discomfort... and why? WHY DO I SAY THIS?

Because honey, they need to arm themselves against that discomfort. You need to have a shield and that shield is OWNING the words. If you let people who use derogatory words own them you have lost power.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Calling a homophobe gay isn't homophobia though, is it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, it is. It reinforces the idea that there is something wrong with a gay homophobe being gay, rather than the problem being that they are a homophobe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

it's perpetuating the view that calling someone "gay" is somehow an insult.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The thing I love the most about these memes is they're seriously effective.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Are they though? I feel like they just make those that found Trump and Elon to be really weird and rotten, have a laugh. I don't know anyone conservative, that has commented on these kinds of memes, to me or others I know.

Or did you mean effective in pulling some political stance BBJ reversal moves?

[–] [email protected] 48 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

It's effective in driving a rift between Musk and Trump, as many news outlets are reporting that they've been contacted by the Trump PR Team to clarify that Trump is in charge after the "President Musk" taunting began. Trump's superiority complex and vanity is absolute, so being upstaged by a positionless goon will make him very unhappy.

Although, I concede that we don't know what actual longterm effect if any this will truly have.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Oh I see. That's a solid take on the situation IMO. Haha yeah. Time will tell what comes of this shit show being put on by goons, and loons, set on the verge of collapse, USA. Let dumpster fires light their way.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago

With those two divas fighting, it's gonna be several dumpsters full of illegal fireworks. The inept president of the us vs the comparably inept richest man in the world riling up the same cult against each other. Do you think they realized they were in a highlander situation before they got in bed together?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Is it really not obvious who the bottom is?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A reminder that he is wearing a “Occupy Mars” shirt. A movement to occupy Mars. How can we do this? Well we need water. And he wants to bomb Mars to achieve this. The Nazi supporting lunatic wants to bomb Mars!!!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Eh, terraforming Mars by bombing the shit out of it's surface is just one theoretical method, but very long term plan - far extending his mortal life. He wouldn't have patience for such but instead wants to build permanent bases there as soon as possible

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

No, I don’t believe this was to terraform. I think he wanted to bomb it just to release the supposedly hidden water only.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago

Just give Nestle a contract. They'll find it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

Yeah, Trump's soft, shitty brain is no match for Elon's younger, shitty brain.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 day ago (2 children)

bruh why does this image make musk look like a pedophile, i mean look at that face

(oh yea hes probably on the epstein list...)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

Musk the Pedo Guy

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah. Anyone can look weird as hell for one instant of a freeze-frame, I'm not sure how much it means. But he definitely looks weird.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's three freeze frames in a row where he looks dead-behind-the-eyes evil and disturbing.

He looks like he's been doing a lot of drugs.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 21 hours ago

Ketamine, admittedly.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Ego is one hell of a drug

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›