this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
811 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19239 readers
2259 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Right when he's completely useless, he pushes for this. Pathetic and disingenuous.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

Give them all 401ks like most people get.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It’s a little late for that.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

It's never too late for neoliberals to fuck shit up...

Pelosi just threw her weight around to get a 74 year old with terminal throat cancer as the head of the oversight committee...

Even tho he just broke the already weak insider trading laws 2 years ago.

Biden can mumble whatever he wants into a microphone, but it's never connected to the reality around him.

If he really wanted this to happen, he'd have pushed for AOC over Connolly

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago

If he really wanted this to happen, he’d have pushed for AOC over Connolly

If he'd wanted it to happen, he'd have pushed through Pelosi's HR 1 back inside his first 100 days, rather than sitting on this for his last three weeks.

Liberals are going to be doing so much "You could have had nice things if you hadn't voted for Trump" whining and complaining and hand wringing over the next two years. Its going to be awful. But none of them want to talk about how they had both Exec and Leg branches of government twice in the last sixteen years and deliberately squandered it sucking up to Big Business both times.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

I can hear Michael Cole from WWE:

Vintage Biden

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 days ago

Pelosi won't let that happen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I'd be fine with congressional stock trading if congress members were required to immediately report trades instead of the 45 days or so they are currently legally required to

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

nah, they should be forced to divest. Insider trading at an extreme. If you or I commit insider trading it's jail time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

If they wish to invest, it should be in a fund that is managed for them by people without insider knowledge.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Nah, they already got their money by then. Their trades go through first then everyone else's? And prereporting trades is ripe for stock manipulation. They should not be able to personally manage a portfolio and imho insider trading should carry hefty corruption penalties for congress.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'd only be okay with it if those trades were reported and published publicly within the hour of the trade.

Let everyone benefit from inside trader or do the right thing and make everyone subject to the law.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I thought that was currently the case they just had a 45 day max reporting timeline, unless my Nancy pelosi clone portfolio has been lying to me. Apparently her average reporting time is 14 days

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Just curious... How is your Pelosi clone portfolio going? Is it a legitimate investment strategy compared to the usual suggestion of index funds?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

So far over the past year I've had it active, I'm up 40%. It seems to be working well, I have it automated through a service called Autopilot and it has already paid for itself. I wish I put more into it at the start but so far I've got no complaints.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There's two ETFs now for tracking democrat trades and republican trades if you have any interest in tracking this kind of portfolios performance! I don't think there's an ETF for Nancy specifically but she's definitely a part of the dem ETF

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Cool, I tried looking it up.

Seems like the tickers are NANC (D) and KRUZ (R)

Are those the ones you are taking about? If so, I love the tickers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

That would be so funny if the ETF for the Dems was called Nancy

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›