this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
1098 points (98.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27171 readers
3160 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)

I know it would be covenient to accept this meme as true, but it very much isn’t.

Just like insurance companies in the US don’t cover everything you need, sometimes even lifesaving treatment, the same (though less extreme) happens in nearly all public health systems.

I say this as someone who has gone through this and become tubefed and deaf as a result.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think there is a public health system when you are just expected to fork over half a million for an operation. Those insane healthcare prices are uniquely US phenomenon

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

There are public health systems that just won’t offer that operation. Or you’ll have a 1.5 year waiting list. So in the end, unless you’re rich and pay for private insurance, it comes out as the same.

(Edit: since someone thought my take is because I’m american and don’t understand. I’m european, have lived most my life in europe, this is from lived experience)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (7 children)

People in Australia do experience medical bankruptcy. It's incredibly rare now. But it's true. But it used to be so much worse before we had a public health system. And health outcomes were worse as well. And it cost more.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-18/bob-hawke-what-did-australia-have-before-medicare/11124180

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

there's still waiting lists in the US.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah, that happens sometimes. But in this case the price of an operation will be drastically cheaper.
I had this situation in Germany, there was a minor operation I needed to have which was not life threatening so the one that insurance covered had a waiting period, so I decided to go pay out of pocket and it was around 800 euro. The cheapest price I could find in US for it started at 11000 dollars.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (10 children)

For sure. But now imagine your disabled and on disability income, where you get payed 1k a month and are living in poverty.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I mean there's definitely people who go bankrupt due to not being able to work due to illness. If you're a private entrepreneur (or what's the correct term E; self-employed was what I meant) for example then that stuff can take you down easily.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe meme should've specified personal bankruptcy

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

If you're self-employed entrepreneur then it'd be a personal bankruptcy most of the time in Finland. Having an LLC or such thing for such use isn't common.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, that's true. Many countries have subsidies, but especially if it's a significant one who needs constant care, they can't cover everything.

Still, likely a rounding error compared with the US if we consider those who become unable to work due to treatable conditions they can't afford (and their insurance delays, denies and defends)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

It's also that if you get sick at the wrong time, as a self-employed person, that alone can take you down and cause a bankruptcy. Subsidies won't help there if the work just isn't getting done or you miss out on work contracts.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I don't know about the other countries, but In France there definitely still are problems, check this recent story https://www.lanouvellerepublique.fr/a-la-une/on-lui-refuse-l-acces-aux-urgences-elle-accouche-sur-le-parking-de-l-hopital

A pregnant women was refused entrance to a private hospital she was forced to give birth on the parking lot in front of the entrance.

Sure the USA have an awful system but it doesn't mean it's perfect everywhere else. There are people that are bankrupt because of medical treatment here too. And we also have corrupt CEOs making it worse

Every country needs a Luigi.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

USA have an awful system but it doesn't mean it's perfect everywhere else

I don't think that's the message in this post either, so... The message is, it's just far, far worse with the system they have, due to all healthcare being privatized.

At least that is my understanding. 🤷‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes of course,

I replied to this post because it is one of many making bold claims about healthcare in other countries than the US, most of the times claims about European countries healthcare made by US users are false and/or misleading.

Sure the US has a very bad system, I see it and recognize how bad it is, but it's a tad annoying to see stuff like that, that falsely say we have "0" bankruptcy or that "everything" is covered by public healthcare, that our life expectancy is that much higher, etc... Most claims are unsourced and blatantly false or largely inflated for shock value.

In France for example we have many issues with our public healthcare, not everything is covered (dental isn't for example), we aren't covered for the full amount unless we pay for private coverage on top (called "mutuelle") which often are linked to your employer, we have to pay up front and then get reimbursed later, geographically there are areas with very few hospitals, the poorer often can't afford to be sick because we aren't always automatically paid for sick days at work, there's a shortage of medical fields' workers, and our current political leaders have been making it worse for decades..

All that to say that from the perspective of a "European" citizen, these posts about the US system compared with ours feels like propaganda that "we should be happy with what we have" even though we really shouldn't, using false information.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Very good points. I haven't seen many other posts regarding this, so I just saw it in this isolated context.

But still, even with the flaws in our European systems, most of them are far superior to the US. The insane amounts you get charged for a simple accident can be hilarious. It's like, breaking a leg costs the same as buying a car. It shouldn't be that way. :-( Especially when the accident is caused by someone else.

But, you're not wrong. 👍 No system is perfect, definitely. Our healthcare system in my country is silently on the verge of collapse because the wages are so low. So employees are quitting left and right, because the stress and workload is not worth the pay. Yet there is a requirement to offer healthcare, so they hire fill-in workers that cost waaaaaay more, so the cost still goes up either way for the employers, yet the net number of workers is also fewer than before. So they are paying more money for less workers, instead of just paying proper salaries for the ones that are actually employed.

It's ridiculous. They'd rather spend 2x money than pay x money, for the principle. Just a big 🖕 to the workforce.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't speak French. Why didn't she go to the public one? Why was she forced to give birth on the parking? Why not call an ambulance?

Unpopular opinion incoming: I can understand if they didn't allow her in in a PRIVATE one if she was not covered.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

She was too far gone to be able to go to the nearest public one.

It's actually a huge scandal in France, we have laws preventing this, and the hospital is pretending that it was a mistake from an individual employee to refuse her.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's almost like .. universal healthcare would make our economy stronger and the insurance companies are the leaches..

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Apparently no one is 100% sure whether bloodsucking worms were named after doctors that used them, or doctors were named after the blood sucking worms that they commonly prescribed.

"Leech" being an old timey name for a medical doctor, possibly predating the term "doctor" which just came from "teacher" like "doctrine" or something.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Some people don't want universal health care because they don't want their taxes going towards other people's health care. What they seem to fail to understand is that the exact same thing happens with private health insurance, and some of the money goes towards the insurance company's profits. Universal health care would make things cheaper.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, they don't want people who don't "contribute" to benefit off THEIR money!

What if... GASP, an ILLEGAL would benefit off their money???? Because you know, those illegals are just on all the gov files and they can strode into places and say "giv me moneyz" and we can't do anything about it!

It's purely down to not wanting to help others below them. Irony is not part of their vocabulary.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

That's an easy 6 billion profit! Just pick them up in an ambulance and have them overnight for an upset stomach ulcer.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I know it's probably a bit exaggerated on purpose but also in European countries it's definitely not zero. We are in a significantly better situation than the US, that's fot sure. Our problems aren't remotely comparable. But also here, it can happen that certain treatments aren't covered, also here there are (few) people without health insurance and also here people can lose their job or never find a job in the first place due to illness related issues or disabilities.

As said, much better but also definitely not 0.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (5 children)

There's also the issue of waiting times - you might need care somewhat urgently, but need to either wait for multiple months or pay (or hope that when the issue becomes more immediately life-threatening they can handle it in time). Public healthcare isn't perfect, and at least in many places still needs a lot of work.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

The good thing is that it creates a great competition for the privates. I have a very good insurance for 1K a year. No extra payments. Can go as much as I want. Many locations included. For "small" or "quick", I go to the private one. Saves me time and reduces waiting times for public.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I always dislike this take because it pretends the US doesn't have this exact issue. I've known people with less than ideal insurance who had very few doctors to pick from in-network and would take months to get an appointment.

Long wait times still happens in the US. Just like it can happen in public healthcare.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Pedant rant:

I take issue with 'needs a lot of work', though it is common phrasing. It promotes the false idea that 'business is more efficient' by making it sound like the public administrators are too dumb to know how to do their job.

The real issue, in most jurisdictions, is that it needs more and stable funding, and less political interference.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well that and not to mention that politicians abroad do the exact same thing they do in the US. I know the British for instance have a Conservative Party that have repeatedly attacked their healthcare system in order to make privatized insurance seem better.

And then the issues caused by a lack of funding get used in the US to say “SEE! This system doesn’t work!”

Which is the logical equivalent of watching your friend baking pies with not enough filling and deciding to instead pay 4x the price for a pie that you won’t even get your promised slice of. Oh and the pie you get occasionally is made with the meat of other people who were also promised a pie and paid for it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

yes, and the latest "conservative" assailants on UK (maybe mostly English) health system wear red roses on their lapels.

They all see a giant unmilked cash cow wandering around in a short skirt.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

OK, i need to chime in here, there is illness related work loss here in Canada. Also, you can go bankrupt from dental work if you cannot afford dental insurance or your job doesn't offer it (which most jobs that are not union/higher corp don't). You can literally die from poor dental hygiene, and even if you brush your teeth every day and floss, that doesn't mean your scott free from visiting the dentist.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In it's first three months, Canada's new Dental care plan has 75% of dentists signed up and 2.3m people.

As part of a phased rollout, the government began accepting claims for dental coverage for seniors in May and expanded eligibility to children under the age of 18 and Canadians with a valid Disability Tax Credit certificate in June.

Remaining eligible Canadians are scheduled to gain access in 2025.

Source: https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/we-ve-seen-an-explosion-75-per-cent-of-canadian-dental-care-providers-now-partaking-in-federal-plan-1.6991335

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The lesson is vote blue, and the USA has failed every single test for over 12 years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If that's the lesson then when were we supposed to learn it? I am old enough to remember very well the last time Democrats tried to do something about healthcare. They gave up on single payer before the debate even started. Was that when I was supposed to learn to vote for them harder or was it one of the times they fucked over the only person with actual plans to implement universal healthcare?

Yes, Democrats are clearly better than the fascists masquerading as conservatives, but that doesn't mean they're fighting the good fight. They don't even try to force a vote on most things people actually care about. They just throw up their hands and complain that doing things is hard. Then everyone sits around blaming voters for not loving these ineffectual dipshits enough. Fuck that, they suck it's been that way for a lot more than 12 years.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

When Democrats had 60 votes one DNC Senator, Joe Liebermen, stopped singlepayer from passing.

Joe died in 2013 at the ripe old age of 82.

Every single Republican voted No on singlepayer. They also voted No on the Medicaid Expansion and Protections for pre-existing conditions. Republicans continue to tell us repeatedly that they want to gut Medicaid and that Medicare for the elderly is also on the chopping block, but they haven't been able to get 60 votes, yet.

So the answer to your question of when is: Every Goddamn Year. If you want Single Payer then just elect 60 Dems to the senate, OR just 10 to 13 anybody else who is willing to vote for Single Payer, and if one of them still betrays us then elect a few more. We have privatized healthcare because voters are voting for politicians who want privatized healthcare, simple as.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The amount of misinformation about this guy…

Joe Lieberman had been an independent for years when he voted against single payer, and he died in 2024, after 11 years of retirement.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Ah mb lol

Well regardless he left office in 2013 and he's dead now, thankfully.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You’re good, I meant it literally about disinformation, so I don’t doubt you read it somewhere that seemed credible.

I’m from Connecticut, and we’re all still mad about it, so it always sticks out to me when someone thinks he was a democrat at the time (he did generally caucus with democrats, but was very pro-business. He was not elected again.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›